《太行英雄传》最近在央视八频道播出，一度夺收视率冠军。很多人可能搞不明白，没有IP效应，没有流量明星主演，也没有话题炒作，如此抗战剧凭什么能够获得收视率冠军？

需要声明的一点，该剧主要讲述国共两党如何联合一致抗日，不走高大上路线，而是讲述“非正规军”热血抱团抗战的故事，显然这个方向算是走对了，因为普通百姓的抗日故事更能够激发观众观看的激情，以及激发他们爱国热情和对侵略者残暴行径无比的憎恨。不仅仅主打情怀，更是燃起观众对和平的向往和对美好幸福生活的珍惜。

这篇影评可能有剧透 前言： 不要主观臆断一部影片的好坏 努力发掘它的闪光点 才能证明你的强大 1. 裘德喜欢跟妈妈做捉迷藏的游戏，将鞋子放在墙边，自己从另一边出来，这一招屡试不爽。而父亲已经第三次因为工作原因没能回家陪伴两人。 十一点五十一分丽莎被楼下的动静所吵醒，查看裘德的房间之后...  (展开)

不是淑芬 由于偶然的机会知道了这部剧 虽然说对于于正的作品从来没有什么期望(也都是自己作的，招牌也是自己砸烂的) 还是去看了一下 看到很多人对于杨蓉的表演各种夸赞 我以为我能够坚持下去 结果 还是一样要对于妈say goodbye.
这剧没了以往于妈剧那艳到眼瞎的色调，取而代之的是满屏明晃晃的柔光以及美图秀秀版的滤镜，相比之前的色调，进步是有的，然而依旧粗糙
布景上于妈真是将 浮夸 二字演绎到极致，明亮空荡荡的警察局，科幻电影里般的实验室及办公室，没有一点点真实感，印象里拥有此类布景的，仍是马桶台那些玛丽苏雷剧。不是说布景不能干净整洁，而且，干净整洁过了头，便缺少了“人生活过的气息”，显得假
选角上，男主真的败笔，女主说得过去但我始终无法get到时尚警花的点，而男二，在我看来真的惨不忍睹充满槽点可谓鬼斧神工。首先我不理解为什么非得找个韩国人来拍，也不见得演的多好，配音与表演充斥着违和感；其次造型满满的油腻感。然后这位美男子在极其玛丽苏的旁白里出场，通过女学生女警官的星星眼烘托出此男子不仅玉树临风并且集多重身份于一身（人家是走实力派的哦），并且用男老师的不满侧面烘托出此男子的不羁与个性。出场就用pad一边做菜一边直播教学，装B装的第一眼就很想暴打他。

这篇剧评可能有剧透 传说中的“Doctor X”大门未知子是一个医术十分高明的外科医生。她不属于任何组织，以自由医生的身份辗转于不同医院工作。这次未知子来到帝都大学附属医院的总院，医院里正上演下任院长的竞逐战。三大热门候选人包括处心积虑往上爬的优秀外科医生近藤忍（藤木直人饰），人称“...  (展开)

问:喜欢看爱情片吗？ 答:喜欢 问:一起去看？ 答:好啊 有人说：所有故事本质上都是一种情绪，没有经历过的就无法懂得。如果你深陷其中，因为你找到了相似。我相信你会在影片中为某句话某些场景而触动，想到曾经发生或者正在发生在自己身边的一些事情。影片也许卡司阵容不是很强...  (展开)

对《八月》有持续很久的情感，从18岁，2017年开始，每年夏末没事儿都会看一遍，看完以后就是“The summer is gone”。这次在平遥看到《蓝色列车》，已经大学要毕业了。对于多数人来说，《蓝色列车》相对于《八月》而言，理解和感受的成本大概都更高，不过不变的是一以贯之的私...  (展开)

This is the harrowing story of a (not quite) typical mule: Maria Alvarez (Moreno), an intelligent and fiercely independent 17-year-old girl from Colombia who agrees to smuggle a half-kilo of heroin into the United States.

Walking out of the theatre, I found myself at a loss of words.

What struck me the most about the story was how un-exaggerate everything was. Let it be Maria’s job, her village, or her family. They were portrayed with moderation and care. The result was impressively real and honest. Maria’s job was not uncommon for a third world country’s village girl of 17. I’ve read far worse treatment and horror stories of factory workers in ShenZheng, China. The real evil was in the lack of a choice. All Maria had was the job in the flower factory. It was the only economic opportunity presented to Maria. It was what her family, even her entire village depended on. Sounds familiar? I thought of that British mining town in Billy Elliot.

Like all country girls who rebelled against their fate, Maria made a choice, the same choice all country girls in her shoes made, to go to the city. On her way, she was tempted away from the possibility of becoming a rich family’s maid; instead, she was offered an adventure. Traveling, America, and American dollars added together proven to be too big a temptation to turn down for a rebellious country girl. Was there really a huge difference for her, between pulling thorns off roses and swallowing cocaine pellets and carried them to America? Both were rich people’s merchandises, both were beyond her reach. She was one little link in the economy chain. The latter sounded a lot more exciting than the former, and it would take her beyond the depressing village outside of Bogota. She was, finally, presented a choice.

The subsequent story made me admire Maria’s intelligence and coolness. But it also chilled me to the bone to see how cruel and brutal the drug world was (is).

Would legalizing drugs clean up all these brutality? Would legalizing drugs prevent Maria and her fellow Columbian women from participating in this dark and ugly trade?

If so, then why wouldn’t any country take that step?

“Because drugs are evil and hurt people who use them. How could you legalize something so damaging to our very selves? How could any government give out any signal that drug abuse is ‘legal’, therefore, ‘ok’?”

Because not legalizing it made it worse? Because the huge profit margin is driving the drug trade into a frenzy, and it is killing poor people like Maria left and right? Cigarette is legal, isn’t it? It is harmful to people’s health, too. Why is that okay to endorse but not drugs? Since when human being became such innocent creatures?

“If you legalize drugs, then more people will become drug addicts. That would be disastrous and self-destructive.”

Okay. People have self-destructive tendencies. There are evils in these world, too many. People always have the choice of whether to become drug addicts, just like people have the choice of whether to smoke a cigarette. Are you saying that government has the right to make the choice for its citizens that the government knows what is best? What about education? What about the fittest survive? It is not like I don’t get drug offered when I walk down Telegraph Ave. in Berkeley, it is not like high school kids don’t get drug offers in parties, at playground, on their way to school, anyways. It is happening right now. How much worse could it get? Besides, once it became legal, it could take away the “adventurous lure” it has right now to the rebellious type. Couldn’t it?

Drug abuse is part of modern societies already. We have to deal with it. But if legalizing it could take away the huge profit for the drug lord, then it could reduce their incentive to produce them. It could dry up so many money sources for terrorist groups and anti-government organizations. It could save Maria and girls like her the fate of dying on ruptured cocaine pellets that they carry in their stomach. It could save them from being treated like animals (”mule”), whose stomach was cut open so their cargo could be retrieved. Mule’s life was of no consequence. The dehumanization of Maria and her fellow mules was not caused by drug’s own evil-ness directly. It was made possible by the huge profit of drug trade, and its huge profit came from their illegal status. It was made possible because of human being’s own greed.

If government wants to do good to the society, then it could place the choice into everyone’s own hand. Take away the possibility to make people even more greedy than they already are. Don’t tempt them. Trust them.

In Chinese modern history, there was a much revered national hero, General Lin Zexu. Who initiate the fight against the British in 1840’s. He burned all the opium he could gather in a huge public display. His angry words are still recited in today’s Chinese elementary school classrooms, “Opium is evil, it weakened our people, our soldier, our country…” But the fact was, Chinese society was weakened from inside before opium even appeared. The closed society has been quietly rotten away from top to bottom for centuries. There was little outlet for real talent of the society. There wasn’t much progress happeneing for the society as a whole. Corruptions were prevalent. Opium provided an escape. A dying plant happened upon a killer disease. It was easy to blame the disease. Even though General Lin Zexu won his opium war, the final treaty between the British and the Qin Dynasty turned out to be the first of many humiliating treaties to come in China’s Modern History. Burning Opium didn’t help General Lin’s cause. Burning the entire country might. That was exactly what Chairman Mao tried over a century later.

There is a little analogy in gardening. When a flower attracted diseases, it was often because the plant itself was weak and unhealthy, either from lack of water, light, or too much water, etcetera. To prevent disease from happening, you either make the plant strong and healthy, or you try to shut down all disease sources. The latter has proven to be a harder path. Shutting down flow of air would usually cause more problems to the plant. Exposing the plant to the natural elements was usually more healthy for the plant. As long as the plant was healthy, often it could fight off many diseases using its own strength.

最近也没有多少时间看电视剧了，但还是硬挤出时间，就这样花了八天时间陆陆续续看完这25集的秋官版《倚天屠龙记》，今天看完，来写个影评。
这版在香港那边是经典，金庸先生也曾亲自赞许过这版倚天，不过用现在的眼光看，78版倚天的问题不少，首先篇幅较短，显得剧情有些流水账，而且最后赵敏没有和张无忌在一起，而是为了救汝阳王和王保保而摔下悬崖。张无忌站在赵敏坟前哭诉，却意外发现了赵敏从林中走过（这应该是张无忌的幻觉吧），想同为78年的邵氏电影版《倚天屠龙记》，最后结局也是张无忌孤身一人，赵敏因为和张无忌身份有别，离张无忌而去，武打也比较假，但在1978年，已经很难得了。
秋官的张无忌演的还不错，就是结局那一幕显得窝囊了，其实我觉得秋官更适合演张翠山，阿姐演殷素素也不错（反正我觉得这版选夏雨和黄淑仪演张翠山和殷素素挺坑的）。
赵雅芝此时还不是很漂亮，这时候演技也不是很好，芝姐的少妇装比较好看，少女装一般般。
没看此版《倚天》之前，网上已经许多人吐槽汪明荃的赵敏，说汪明荃“大妈”“丑”之类的，但是我看完，我却觉得，阿姐的赵敏根本一点也不“大妈”，就是长的差了点，但阿姐演技气质很好，举手投足之间都像极了赵敏，在武当山劝降张三丰那一段戏中，阿姐可算霸气极了，至于相貌问题，个人认为阿姐的赵敏男装要比女装好看。
此版殷离扮演者庄文清就是《上海滩》里那个汪月祺，不过她在这里的扮相不敢恭维，而且结局也没有出来（在78、84、86这三个电视剧版中，殷离都没有出现）。小昭是陈玉莲演的，虽然此时陈玉莲胖了些也黑了些，但还是很可爱，如果打光和化妆好些，也是个俏丽的小昭。

大家都在大谈这部人兽恋电影的先进性，然而就因为是人兽恋爱讲述社会关怀，兜售了一个怪里怪气的政治正确，所以就是先进么？ 我真的觉得如果一些好莱坞40岁以上的导演里相当一部分愿意写和拍这种怪诞故事，这种片子能像可乐一样从流水线上排出来，温情童真的斯皮尔伯格、硬朗矫...  (展开)

我不懂谈电影，我只懂谈感想。

我并不是第一次写观影感想。在许多许多年前，我还给另一部电影写过观影感想。那篇观影感想被我删除了，原因是里头提到的那个女孩子离开了我、从我的世界里消失了。也许与所有沉浸于失恋痛苦中的人一样，当时我以为自己不会在爱了。

听说那个女孩子在与我分手之后半年便结婚了。我不敢去求证分手后的那半年里，不，应该说是在我们那段感情的尾巴到底发生了什么事。我宁可去相信她的离开，是因为我当时渴求的爱对她过于沉重，同时我没有能力给予她所需要的爱。那一年，我还在读大三，才失母爱。

回想起那段故事，又沉淀了一下与孙老师相知相爱的近五年，我觉着就与那位女孩的分开并不遗憾。且不论因为与她分开才有了与孙老师的邂逅，就分开这件事情而言，那位女孩与我的分开算是最美的。因爱意情感的纠葛而分开固然让人慨叹，但那些因柴米油盐而割裂的感情，更让人感到不忿与无力罢。

与孙老师相识于研究生的时候，那着实是段几乎无忧无虑的日子，然后经历了毕业、就业、无业、自由职业。以前的同事听见我在写故事，都说拿孙老师与我的故事照搬上来就够了。当然，我不会这么做，至少目前不会。但孙老师与我着实一同经历了许多不多人会经历的事情。迫使我们几乎分开的并不是情感纠葛，即使那段日子我们一直在为情感纠葛而争吵，但真正的矛盾却是诸如柴米油盐的生活牵绊。面对那些生活牵绊，我的乏力让我一度借着出差回不来的名义躲在外地的酒店里，哪怕经常要与孙老师在电话里争执到深夜、工作效率及精神状况极差，我都不敢去直面她的悲伤。

我们熬过来了。付出了代价。而今时不时还会因那时产生的后遗症而神伤。但我觉得我们不再仅仅是爱人，同时还是生活里的战友。我们已经不可能也不会分开了。

帮助我们熬过来的，是初心。

初心并不是没有动摇过。在我困惑的时候，我会央她给我唱《两只小毛驴》。我不知道为什么，但她每次唱着“我有两只小毛驴我从来也不骑”的时候，我对她的爱意会汹涌而出，就会极想用尽自己所有的力气去抱紧她。这份初心经过生活的磨砺和发酵，升华成了面对困难与波折时的勇气，以及面对柴米油盐时的一份坚定。

至少在我看过的爱情电影里，角色们都是幸运的，他们不需要面对柴米油盐。正如这部电影里，叶雯雯是店长、陈震轩不是顶级也是高级设计师，文艺与李想都是显而易见的家境显赫，顾小蕾与凌霄的工作都很体面且工作中的竞争不算残酷，田海心对她的工作游刃有余而曹大鹏哪怕对鸭子极度痴迷却也体现着他一门专精的巨大价值。他们只需要面对爱与不爱、想与不想，要不是“以为不是你结果还是你”，便是“以为不是你怎么会是你”，又或是“我认定是你果然就是你”，兜兜转转总能圆满。

但生活不是这样的。至少我对生活的理解，完全不是这样的。

很多年来，我都是不看爱情电影的。似乎大部分的这类电影都只谈爱与不爱、不谈柴米油盐。爱与不爱、想与不想，只是一种分歧，但柴米油盐是爱情的终身死敌。

就像我自己脑补的，叶雯雯迟早要面对陈震轩亡妻在他及孩子心中留下的痕迹，她会困惑自己接受陈震轩到底是不是因为一时的感动以及一时的母爱泛滥。是的，陈震轩爱她，很厚重的爱，但他也不敢承认，因为一旦承认便似乎是对亡妻的否认。那句“遇见你是最美的事情”（非原句），只是一时冲动写下的话语。陈震轩是挣扎的，爱得是偷偷摸摸的。冲动过后，柴米油盐的日子一过起来，叶雯雯会发现的。

文艺因李想而从音乐中感受到了快乐，但快乐并不如苦闷那么显眼那么恒久。李想在校园里或是成就斐然，但且不说国外和国内的氛围，单说社会与校园对一个人价值的认可根本不是一回事。柴米油盐的日子一过起来，他们迟早还要面对对自我价值的困惑。挣扎、否定，将任性和他人的包容当做发扬个人风格、不谈责任的借口，是文艺青年的通病。这种病的结果，往往是经过系列合理化之后看似洒脱的离开。

顾小蕾终于收获了她一直期盼的婚姻，可她并不见得了解感情的本质。凌霄最终向她求婚，并不是因为在自己与死神擦肩而过之后忽然的想通了，而是因为爱她、害怕失去她而满足她。许多女人向男人索求安全感，她们往往以为男人怎么做了便能获得，但这种获得只是假象。安全感源自对自我价值的充分肯定与自信，这种肯定与自信，顾小蕾没有。柴米油盐的日子一过起来，因为爱她，凌霄还要付出更多、更多，哪怕觉得到了自己的极限，也仍要付出更多、更多。

相比之下，田海心与曹大鹏踏实多了，他们遇见的正是柴米油盐的日子过起来后出现的问题。曹大鹏与田海心离婚来源于他对她的爱、对她一时嘴硬的深信不疑，以为那就是她想要的，但他反应过来了。田海心放弃了事业投奔于家庭是因为她终于找到了在生活中某个时期自己所需要担任的某个角色，这种角色的变化在以后的日子里还要经历数次。他们沉淀下来的，是面对生活中的种种而需要的智慧。收获的，是守护他们初心的壁垒。

从电影的角度来说，我觉得只谈爱与不爱、不谈柴米油盐，很浅。那不是我们生活的模样，更不是生活的升华。

从看电影的角度来说，不谈柴米油盐、只谈爱与不爱，很美。或者生活已经多多少少让人不堪了，又何必在电影中继续提醒着大家生活的瞬息万变、举步维艰呢？

最后，冲着孙老师一句“这是近年来看过BUG最少的爱情电影”——是啊，在飞机上顾小蕾身边的座位神奇的空置着是因为她同时买了凌霄的飞机票，四星吧。何况，这部电影再怎么浅，或浓或淡的，是想给人一份暖意。


2015-4-3 1:10 初稿
睡觉了，想得起来又有空的话再修改吧。