看完可以很明确的是，这个电影就不是一个剑戟片。打斗场面很少，最后的喷血也很不符合整个电影的格调。其实整体如果做到藤吾与同事对决时砍伤双手，假模假样不喷血会比现在要好很多。

之所以给满分还是因为我的美术出身，整个电影每一帧画面都是壁纸级的构图，充满了东方精神的美学气质。可作为日本武士电影构图的典范了。花配人物，剑

一部 看到名字 就知道结局的 电影。当不抱撒期待点开时才发现，他里面处处惊喜，仿佛带你直面了那一场战役一般，更主要的是，他和李延年一样，解释了 我们的先辈不只是去 别的国家参加了一场战争，而是为了 身后的 家人祖国 才会那么舍生忘死的战斗的原因。 剧组虽然穷，但是还原的是真的细，演技也是真的好，真不希望 那些资本 为了赚钱 逮着 主旋律乱拍，搞的大家 pdsd，

1、2、3、4、5……，佐知子与吊儿郎当的同事僕擦肩而过时，故意轻轻碰了一下他。逃了一天班的僕不知自己是否会错了意，于是站在原地数数。他想，数到120佐知子还没回来，就是自己会错意了。

117，佐知子出现在僕身边。他们虽是同一家书店的店员，但彼此并不熟。僕是店里的异类，老板觉得他穿得太邋遢，中年同事觉得他没责任心。在那里，他

1、2、3、4、5……，佐知子与吊儿郎当的同事僕擦肩而过时，故意轻轻碰了一下他。逃了一天班的僕不知自己是否会错了意，于是站在原地数数。他想，数到120佐知子还没回来，就是自己会错意了。

117，佐知子出现在僕身边。他们虽是同一家书店的店员，但彼此并不熟。僕是店里的异类，老板觉得他穿得太邋遢，中年同事觉得他没责任心。在那里，他几乎没有朋友，独来独往。回到家里，他也只有一个失业的室友静雄为伴。静雄刚刚被停调失业保险金，正打算从母亲那里借点钱度日，但母亲刚出院，还得从他要钱。

佐知子主动约僕喝酒，僕却依旧是一脸茫然又无所谓的样子，看不出内心喜悦与否，寡淡地说要先回趟家，让佐知子等他电话，在店里碰头。

回到宿舍，慵懒地把裤子脱到小腿，打开冰箱，僕表现得一点不像准备赴初次约会的男生，睡过约定的时间，于是跟静雄在外面喝到天亮。佐知子突然地邀约，并没有给僕带来多大的期待，他仍然保持着无欲无求的懒散状态。

【详细】

10305647

被迫旁听了几集快受不了了，太扯淡了，剧情设定毫无逻辑，漏洞百出，处处充满了不合理，自以为搞笑热闹，为闹而闹，为吵而吵，神烦。

女主一个卖身葬父的反而整天自己是主人似的，蛮横不讲理不说，死赖上给人当老婆，为了拆散男主和公主不择手段，三观呢？这是卖身葬父的孤女还是刁蛮公主？而且分明有个干娘为什么非要卖身葬父？感觉上简直就是一个为了赖上男主而做的局。

一个状元整天住宫里，一

看一部剧，找到自己所能喜欢的和感受到的点就好。没有千篇一律的所谓评判标准，有的只需要跟着自己的心走。

电影的一些瞬间截图下来回味又变得不一样，抓住每个自己喜欢的点，怕在记忆的长河里一点点的遗忘。

看一部剧，找到自己所能喜欢的和感受到的点就好。没有千篇一律的所谓评判标准，有的只需要跟着自己的心走。

电影的一些瞬间截图下来回味又变得不一样，抓住每个自己喜欢的点，怕在记忆的长河里一点点的遗忘。

看完1马上来看的2。剧情竟然没有按照自己想象的发展，却又合情合理。片尾的memo似乎回应了1里哥哥所写的那封信，字里行间，真喜欢呀！最后的三句话也很值得回味

So, even through you're only a kid once well, unless you get to be a kid twice. which is really weird, to be honest.

不要太过纠结于过去的失败，除非你能返老还童。

【详细】

14222656

且不论黄渤演技，就想问一个问题，冬晓啥时候怀孕的？

高中？不太可能吧，如果是高中，这片应该禁播，如果是大学，那好了，大学交男朋友怀孕虽然不谨慎，但也不至于被老妈关家里呀，成年人了，关的住吗？后面种种奇葩，完全建立在编剧的yy之上了

还有黄渤的老板，也是他的大学老师吧，也是冬晓的大学老师呀，第一集见了冬晓不互认一下吗？攀一攀师生之谊也是人之常情，只能说明编剧完全没有生活

这部片子开始看的时候就觉得哪有自己亲身母亲对自己孩子那么坏的呀，后来才知道不是她亲身的。幸亏女主的继父好，不然女主都被折磨死了。女主的继父后来死了感觉挺可惜的，好人命不长呀。

这里面的故事情节不是特别好最主要就是里面演的不出彩，长大的女主没有小女孩演得好，其实女二不算坏，他的父亲真坏。

整部片子不是蛮好看，太啰嗦了

因为灯光、妆容，所以没有给“力荐”。我从未想过，这版还会有第二部，所以第二部的不期而至，对我而言，是很大的惊喜。当然，直到看到第一集的时候，惊喜就变成惊吓。但往下看后，如果只因为妆容、灯光和颜艺，就认定奥特曼导演不如永田琴，那对他就有失公允了。在这一部中，我看到熟练的场面调度，镜头运动，还有采用了大量正反打的反应镜头，这些都是第一部最大的缺陷。尤其是很多场景如直树给琴子挑走面包屑时，给了一个

【白色强人】非常好看的剧。非常精彩的主题，马国明想做纯粹的医生不关心政治，可是工作是离不开各种各样的政治的，谁都不能置身事外。有一集小敏受伤，唐诗咏一个眼神蒋志光接住，那种演绎特别揪心和打动人。tvb我最喜欢的男演员是黎耀祥和马国明，黎耀祥演技不用说了

应云卫导演，袁牧之编剧，陈波儿袁牧之主演，陶建平与黎丽琳。有声片。电通第一部影片。

学校与真正社会的区别，对人的压迫。如果不与资本同流合污，不成为剥削人的资本，就要被资本剥削。

男性与女性的身份互换，女性的职场压迫，男性导演对女性人物理想化的想像。

声音的使用（送老校长出国，陶建平到泰山旅馆找黎丽琳，毕业歌），重复蒙太奇（三次楼梯特写，两次搬家，一次陶建平

一开始看到剧名，我是拒绝的，“黄继光堵枪眼”从小时的课本到c6的荧屏，这个故事太过于熟悉，熟悉到荧幕还没开始就能猜到剧情。事实我错了，导演的镜头才真正带我走近这个熟悉又陌生的英雄，知道他是如何从通讯员成长为战斗英雄。

想必导演是做了些功课的，喊话、卡壳、哑炮、震爆内伤、三三制…很多细节让人感觉很真实，也很残酷

一开始看到剧名，我是拒绝的，“黄继光堵枪眼”从小时的课本到c6的荧屏，这个故事太过于熟悉，熟悉到荧幕还没开始就能猜到剧情。事实我错了，导演的镜头才真正带我走近这个熟悉又陌生的英雄，知道他是如何从通讯员成长为战斗英雄。

想必导演是做了些功课的，喊话、卡壳、哑炮、震爆内伤、三三制…很多细节让人感觉很真实，也很残酷。但是有些镜头的尸体假人和伤口妆差欧美还有点意思。

【详细】

14708395

这个导演比较不走寻常路，通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影，导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问，他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。

以下两个链接说得很清楚了：

这个导演比较不走寻常路，通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影，导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问，他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。

以下两个链接说得很清楚了：

https://variety.com/2018/film/awards/hereditary-ari-aster-answers-burning-questions-1202841448/

And the fact the family is completely unaware adds to the terror.One way that I pitched the film when I was first taking it out was “it’s a story about a long-lived possession ritual told from the perspective of the sacrificial lamb.” Ultimately we are with the family in their ignorance of what’s really happening. But I also wanted to imbue the film with this sinister, more knowing perspective. Even though we are with the family in their ignorance, the movie itself knows exactly where the story is going. And everything is inevitable. Throughout the film, things are just sort of clicking into place and all those things are driving this family towards one end.

In an early scene, the subject of free will is discussed. Are you saying this family has no free will?Yeah, absolutely. I see the film as being very Greek in that sense. This is absolutely inevitable, the family has absolutely no agency.

There is nothing Annie can do to stop this from happening?No, I don’t think so. That’s where the dollhouses came in. Annie creates these miniature figures and dollhouses and they served as a perfect metaphor for the situation; they’re dolls in a dollhouse being manipulated by outside forces. Any control they try to seize is hopeless.

Is that why she thinks she can stop it by burning the Charlie’s sketchbook – the first time she tries, she catches fire — but the second time, her husband Steve catches fire?Exactly. Even that scene is meant to play as Annie’s big redemptive moment, she’s going to sacrifice herself for her son. It’s a beautiful gesture but part of the cruel logic of the film is it’s an empty gesture. Ultimately, it’s not her choice to make. She thinks there’s a design here and she can end things if she sacrifices herself. But there’s no design and there are no rules. There is a malicious logic at play.

Could it have been prevented if she hadn’t been tricked into casting the spell given to her by Joan?The thing is, that scene is ultimately a red herring, and it’s a piece of misdirection. It plays as a séance scene but really it’s a much darker conjuring and they need Annie to take part in it in order to bring it in the house and in order to further this ritual along. When she invites it in, she escalates things. But it would’ve happened anyway, we’re just seeing how it happened. We’re seeing one of the ways it could play out.

There’s a lot of talk about what a bad mother Annie’s mother was. Did she just have kids for the purpose of this ritual?That’s pretty much what is suggested. If you listen to Annie’s speech at the group therapy, there are a lot of keys in her monologue as to what came before this and how far back this goes.

Early on, Charlie cuts the head off a pigeon and makes a strange figurine out of it. Can you elaborate on that?I don’t want to be too obvious but we find later that Charlie has been building these figurines to populate a diorama she’s been building that serves as a shrine to Paimon. It also functions as a metaphor for what Paimon is doing to this family. If you look at the diorama you’ll see they’re headless figurines bowing to a pigeon-headed creature with a crown on its head, which is not far away from what we’re left with in the last scene of the film.

Annie talks about how her mother got “her hooks” into Charlie at an early age. Are we meant to think Charlie is in on it?Charlie is the first successful host for Paimon. It’s transferred from Charlie to Peter at the end.

Because Paimon wants a male body?Exactly.

Is there ever a Charlie or is she Paimon from the moment she’s born?From the moment she’s born. I mean, there’s a girl that was displaced, but she was displaced from the very beginning.

In an odd way, that makes me feel better.(Laughs) That’s nice. See, it’s a happy ending. But obviously, there’s a boy who’s horribly displaced by the end.

http://www.vulture.com/2018/06/explaining-the-end-of-hereditary.html

Is Paimon a real thing?He is! Well, real in the sense that if you believe in hell and the Devil, Paimon is an actual entity that people do worship. Across various sources, he is designated as “a great King,” “one of the chief demons,” and “one of the most significant Angelick Rulers.” He pledges intense fealty to Lucifer, and is often rendered riding atop a camel (as we see in the movie).

There are conflicting points of view on whether or not Paimon and the demon Azazel are the same. According to the Black Witch Coven, “He is one of the demonic princes overseeing the four cardinal directions, West being his domain,” which is why Joan (Ann Dowd) and her minions “looked to the Northwest” to summon him in the movie. According to the Joy of Satan Ministries, “Paimon gives the power to influence and control others,” and that seems to scan with how he operates in Hereditary. However, the Ministries also describe the hell king as “full of energy. Loud noises and bright lights tend to make him more active. He is very colorful and very friendly.” Maybe the “party naked” side of him just got left on the cutting-room floor, because that guy seems like a downer.

Related Stories

Toni Collette Gets the Worst Inheritance Ever in HereditaryLet’s Talk About the Scene With the Car in Hereditary

What are the “rewards” Annie’s mom wrote to her about in that note?In the Invocations book that Annie pulls out of her mom’s box of things, a photo opposite the image of Paimon shows a person sitting atop a mound of treasure that says “Riches to the conjurer” in a caption beneath. When Joan speaks to Peter/Charlie at the end and crowns him, she asks Paimon to give her and the other followers “knowledge of all secret things, honor, wealth, and good familiars.” She also asks that he bind all men to them, as the worshippers have bound themselves to Paimon.

Those sound like “riches,” and what with a king of hell being resurrected, being recognized as one of his privileged followers will probably be a lot safer than, well, not. In a description of his abilities, Satan Ministries says Paimon “teaches the arts and sciences” in addition to providing “good familiars and gives one position and honor. He can reveal anything about the Earth and one’s mind.” At least some rulers recognize the necessity of science education!

So is Peter Charlie? Or is Peter Paimon?It’s likely that Charlie never knew she was imbued with the spirit of a king of hell, but as Annie says in her grief-counseling group, her mother got “her hooks” in the young girl from the time she was a baby. (Annie’s mom, Ellen, even insisted on feeding baby Charlie — and one of the miniatures depicts grandma offering the infant her exposed breast — which is probably the most unremarked upon insane thing that happens in Hereditary!) As we learn in the opening eulogy, Annie’s mom had “private rituals” and “private friends,” a lot of which probably revolved around putting Paimon into Charlie.

Clearly, though, the long game was to get Paimon into Peter, since Paimon desires a male host, and Charlie sure didn’t seem like she knew she was a preferred underling of the Morning Star! So Paimon was bound to Charlie, and when that little light flash dissolves into Peter’s limp body after he pitches himself out of the attic window at the end, that’s the spirit entering him. With the transfer complete, Joan seems like she’s ready to let Charlie (in Peter’s body) know about everything that’s been going on, and who she really is.

Remember, too, that Annie’s brother hung himself at the age of 16, leaving a note behind saying that his mother had been trying put people inside of him. Ellen failed to secure her son as a host, and she missed her first shot with Peter since Annie had excommunicated her, so she used Charlie as a temporary vessel until the ritual was able to be completed later on. As Aster told Vulture, “The film is about a long-lived possession ritual that is seen from the perspective of the sacrificial lambs.”

Related Stories

How Scary Is Hereditary, This Year’s Horror Hit at Sundance?Hereditary Director Ari Aster Answers His ‘Upsetting’ Film’s Burning Questions

With that in mind, you can think of the movie’s sinister events as being carried out by an invisible hand, of sorts. That sigil painted above grandma’s headless body in the attic? It’s the actual symbol of Paimon, and it was also carved in the utility pole that tore Charlie’s head off. The leafy bit that Annie brushed off her lip when she was drinking tea at Joan’s apartment? Probably a witches brew of some kind (or another red herring, because by now you’re paranoid!). Peter feeling his throat close up and taking the posture of Charlie’s decapitated body before ramming his head into a desk? His body was being primed for a spiritual takeover. Those scrapbook photos of Ellen wearing a white dress and a veil as she’s being showered with gold coins? That sure looks like a wedding ritual, once you see her framed portrait in the satanic tree house, which has a placard with “Queen Leigh” fixed to the top. Does that mean grandma was spiritually married to her granddaughter and therefore breastfed her husband-grandchild when she was an infant? It seems like it!

Did Annie do any of those weird things — decapitating her dead mom’s body, spying on Peter outside his window — or was it the Paimon cult?Aster told Vulture that, “The audience is supposed to suspect that it might be Annie (Toni Collette), but it is the cult of which Ann Dowd is a very significant part. But you are supposed to feel through the film that there are people on the periphery that are watching this family and are hovering just outside.” Therefore, Annie’s sleepwalking was not resulting in her exhuming bodies and cutting their heads off. It was a red herring! Aster laid a sort of bread crumb trail throughout the whole movie, tipping the audience off that the Grahams were always being watched by associates of Ellen and Joan: the man who smiled at Charlie at Ellen’s funeral, all those “new faces” who mourned her death, the woman waving at Charlie across the street from her school, the person breathing in the dark outside of Peter’s window — all of whom we probably saw naked in the tree house during the finale.

What was with that book setting people on fire?It seems like a safe bet that the book was bound to protect itself. The cult did demonstrate they had a pretty long reach when it came to influencing events, and they even stashed a whole headless body in the Graham’s attic when no one was looking. When Annie tried to destroy the book, it protected itself, but Annie was also essential to completing the possession ritual, so she couldn’t just burst into flames and die. We’ll call that a warning shot by the book.

But Steve (Gabriel Byrne)? He had to get out of the way, and the moment he died, Annie stopped being Annie and started being an agent of Paimon, much like when she channeled Charlie into her own body during the previous seance. When that ring of light flashes over her, that’s Paimon beaming into a new host, as Collette explained to Vulture, “Ari was standing to the side, and he let me watch this person be on fire for a while [laughs] and then he said, ‘Okay. Now, Paimon, the light, is going to enter you.’ We never talked about what that would ever look like or be like. I just did one take and that was it.” And that, ladies and gentlemen, is called acting.

Related Stories

Toni Collette on Hereditary, the Wildest Movie of Her CareerNo Kids Were (Permanently) Hurt While Filming Hereditary

What about Annie’s sleepwalking, then?Go with us on this one. What if the sleepwalking was Annie’s subconscious way of fighting her mother and the ritual? She tried to set Peter and Charlie on fire once before, but snapped out of it, right? And then in the dream we see where she admits she wanted to abort Peter but her mom wouldn’t allow it — and so she tried to force a miscarriage — she screams at him, “I wasn’t trying to kill you! I was trying to protect you!” Somewhere in Annie’s subconscious, she must have known her children were in danger, and just as her brother had to kill himself to escape Ellen’s clutches when he was a teenager, Annie must have known deep down that as long as the kids were alive they were existentially threatened.

As Collette told Vulture, in that moment Annie is surfacing what’s in her subconscious, which “allows the audience to know that this is a kind of murky, not entirely understood, gray area about the safety of her children and the intention behind the creation of them — and how her mother was involved, right? So it’s still not entirely clear, but there is an indication of some concern there.” Annie realizes after it’s too late, though, that she part of that threat, and must die if she wants to protect her kids. But by that point the toothpaste is out of the tube, and it just isn’t going back in.

Are the decapitations part of Paimon-related lore?Not really. Aster added that element himself, and he’s not into explaining why. As he told Vulture, “I think it would be disingenuous for me to give any sort of intellectual answer. I feel like there are a lot of really good reasons and I like all of them, but uttering them kind of robs them of something. But I do like all the things that they might provoke in somebody.” As for Collette, she has formed her own theory about all the rolling heads. “We’re so attached to our bodies, we’re so attached to the brain and the mind. They’re like the control center, and that once you lose that metaphorically, you become nothing, and therefore you are able to give yourself over to this greater force?” Speculate away!

So why did he use Paimon?No special reason, really. Aster said to Vulture that he just didn’t want to deploy Lucifer again, and hey, that’s fair. If you need a more substantial explanation than that — just let it go. Sometimes creepy is enough.