用程序员的角度来看，可以用几行入门的代码来解释这个编剧的脑子是什么样的，显而易见的，编剧是傻逼是个非常客观的，公认的真理。希望编剧导演和整个剧组更加努力，变得越来越傻逼

if(1==1)

{

print("编剧是傻逼");

}

else

{

print("编

以前一直不喜欢南极洲，因为寒冷，极寒，想到零下四十度就头皮发麻，条件反射地头疼。我讨厌暴风雪和寸草不生的萧杀，一个冰冷，没有生机的无人之境。直到偶然看到一个船只过德雷克海峡的视频，浪打在窗上逶迤磅礴。发现我现在更喜欢这样的无人之境，宛如科幻片里异星的表面，干净寂寥，没有人类气息。找了这个纪录片去看，第一集就是南极洲，太美了，那些深沉的黑色海岸，一望无际的冰

本文为第13届FIRST青年电影展竞赛入围影片《夫妻不是同林鸟》主创映后交流实录。

*王一舒，FIRST竞赛展映事务主管，映后交流主持人

*谭振邦，《夫妻不是同林鸟》导演

本文为第13届FIRST青年电影展竞赛入围影片《夫妻不是同林鸟》主创映后交流实录。

*王一舒，FIRST竞赛展映事务主管，映后交流主持人

*谭振邦，《夫妻不是同林鸟》导演

【详细】

10331318

最近看了点东西，好像能够反对之前自己的想法。

小城首先是战争中被摧毁的断壁残垣。断壁残垣确乎作为中国古典意象，提供着纵深的、风蚀般缓慢的历史感。但新的因素也蕴含在其中。如空袭平民城市在西班牙格尔尼卡首次成为现代景观，“小城”被进行了一种人为的舶来的强暴的“突袭”，与古典意义迥然不同。这种突袭又是与医生的突然进

首先声明我不是专业看电影写影评的，我是个大学生，喜欢写东西的大学生，写的不对的地方还望批评指正。当你失去一个人的爱情后，回忆起来时，让你难忘与感动的，不应该只是那些甜蜜情话，更多的应该是你爱过一个善良且正直的人。如果说失去之后的回忆常常会让你感到不舍，那请记住，一定要清醒认识到，我钟意于他的心，这可以让我在离开他的日子里，孤独但不寂寞，伤感但不苦涩，思念却不迷醉。假巴意思写篇感想（装

《暗数杀人》。8分。

金泰均导演，金允石、朱智勋主演作品。

和名垂影史的《杀人回忆》一样，《暗数杀人》虽不如前者深刻深远，但它同样值得赞赏！

电影同样根据真实事件改编，在结尾处，导演特意交代虽然真正的罪犯在狱中已自杀，但真正的刑警仍然还在寻找被害

一直以来都很喜欢看灾难片，制作精美震撼特效大片，但国外更突出强调个人英雄救援，对我来说不太真实又很遥远。这次看到朱一龙主演的这部灾难电影《峰爆》宣传以基建工作者作为背景主体，以平凡英雄和中国式救援为主题，让我有些好奇，刚好所在地区也有点映就过来看了。影片真的让我很惊喜，如果说流浪地球打开了中国科幻片的大门，那么峰爆就打开了中国灾难片的大门。不是什么超级英雄而是一群普通的人民在灾难来临的时候化

在《半生缘》这部剧中，集合了相当多的影视明星，而林心如应该算是其中较为特殊的一个，虽然她也有着不错的演艺经历，但是她却是这些演员中唯一一个非科班出身的主要演员。她饰演的曼桢，可谓颠覆了以往的一贯形象，从前的林心如，给人的感觉是清新可人、小鸟依人，而曼桢这个角色，则挖掘出了她的人生经历中的曲折和坎坷，让她充满了女人的高傲和沧桑。

有一位非常喜欢张爱玲小说《半生缘》的观众在博文中写

说实话，我是真没想到国产电影能做的这么差，完全毫无逻辑可言。第一点，人偶那关，主角莫名其妙的说我早该想到这些人偶是有线牵着的，？？？在说这句话之前一点铺垫都没有，你好歹也来个主角抬头仰望或看到那线反光啥的啊，直接突然蹦出这句话。

还有后面主角莫名其妙的就到了机关城中心，在之前人偶那关主角说机关城

《鼠胆英雄》

说实话，拍的其实一般，明明都是明星，演技也不错，但生生演出了只有网文小说的感觉。整部电影的剧情用一个词就可以概括“主角光环”，就是讲了一个普通人拥有主角光环后，多家通吃的结果，最终抱得美人归。整部电影的的评论用一个词就可以说明“俗”。

警匪斗争比不过正经警匪片的勾心斗角，卧底与卧底，无间道。喜剧成分还不如《羞羞的铁拳》。平民电影里不如《无名之辈》《大人物

当年 我问她：

“巴别塔”导演 既然是想送给世人这样一个美丽的礼物，那为何要用如此隐晦的方式？完全可以简单一点 这样接受的人会多一点。哪怕因此牺牲自己水准。可这样是否也有另类的伟大。

她手搭在我肩上，“慈祥”地说：“你觉得这部电影很难懂吗？......其实你可以再多看看一些别的电影.....”原话记不得了 大概内容就是如此。

那年，大概08或09，甚或07

当年 我问她：

“巴别塔”导演 既然是想送给世人这样一个美丽的礼物，那为何要用如此隐晦的方式？完全可以简单一点 这样接受的人会多一点。哪怕因此牺牲自己水准。可这样是否也有另类的伟大。

她手搭在我肩上，“慈祥”地说：“你觉得这部电影很难懂吗？......其实你可以再多看看一些别的电影.....”原话记不得了 大概内容就是如此。

那年，大概08或09，甚或07。北大，满眼春光或是玉兰花。从人满为患的教室出来，刚接受完戴爷两小时每句话都高浓度极其抽象让你直接颅内高潮的电影课程。

她讲课从来不看稿 善用极其复杂而精致的长句，且内容包罗万象每句都是制高点且充满了哲学意味，360全方位拂动你的人生观世界观价值观知识量，让它们轻舞飞扬。她的话，是真正的出口成章。可以直接拿去印书打印，你还得熬夜看很久才能看懂的那种......

从此之后 我开始看“蓝白红”三部曲 “霸王别姬”，仅豆瓣mark过的电影快一千部。

也懂得了曾经的问题虽然出发点是好的，可实际上一切好的作品到了某个境界就该独立存在，仅仅作为一个美好的事物而存在。为能看懂的人准备。为能欣赏的人而准备。而不该是“教化”，或者刻意去具备这样的功能。万万不能。实际上也没必要。

当然 也不排除她当时实际上也一时间无法回答我这个傻妞的问题哈哈哈哈。因为我现在才发现当年其实我想问的并非是一个电影学术问题，而是一个哲学问题....But那时真的很困扰。困扰到些许生气。

Anyway，想说，戴锦华 中国最优秀的学者和教授。

这是另一个我真正多年念念不忘的人。

伟大的人。

伟大的女性。

“奇葩的人”。

又是真正“正常的人”。

生而为人 太宰治说：“我很抱歉”。

生而为人 有人满眼是大海 满脑是天才。满嘴是珠玉。满身是星光。

戴爷 我爱你！????

为了你这样的人 我怎么都能舍弃的了北京？

大师没有远去 她就是今日大师。

【详细】

97861079

追到第17集，趁着今天不更新，写点关于《长相守》杂七杂八的感受，也算是纪念中学时代唯一追过的网络小说。

虽然有很多人吐槽选角，吐槽服化道，但是作为一个从头到尾追完小说的人想公正地说，剧情改编得真的很好了。海大当初的野心太大了，想要“红楼“般描绘一个大家族的兴衰，也想要仙侠小说里的玄幻奇景，还想要权谋小说的朝野纷争，宫廷争斗。遗憾的是，作为一个普通读者觉得海大最后没能掌控住全局，不

【救妻同学会】看来还要拍救B同学会。这是一部爱情友情青春悬疑惊悚滤镜混剪的电视剧，两个以上的时间混搭穿插，有的时候几分钟就跳转。想法不错，拍的不错，人物不错，演的一般，负评

编剧在线，故事很有说服力且贴近生活，故事的发展通过台词和剪辑一步一步呈现，爱情剧里也有很多线索哦。

关于剧情的部分：轻喜剧风格且贴近生活又不入俗套，剧中传递的价值观很正，涉及不卑微的暗恋、原生家庭等话题。可圈可点的地方太多，不一一点出。如果有人不喜欢这部剧，记得千万不要怪编剧和导演。要怪就怪演员，演员招黑，或

这个导演比较不走寻常路，通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影，导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问，他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。

以下两个链接说得很清楚了：

这个导演比较不走寻常路，通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影，导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问，他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。

以下两个链接说得很清楚了：

https://variety.com/2018/film/awards/hereditary-ari-aster-answers-burning-questions-1202841448/

And the fact the family is completely unaware adds to the terror.One way that I pitched the film when I was first taking it out was “it’s a story about a long-lived possession ritual told from the perspective of the sacrificial lamb.” Ultimately we are with the family in their ignorance of what’s really happening. But I also wanted to imbue the film with this sinister, more knowing perspective. Even though we are with the family in their ignorance, the movie itself knows exactly where the story is going. And everything is inevitable. Throughout the film, things are just sort of clicking into place and all those things are driving this family towards one end.

In an early scene, the subject of free will is discussed. Are you saying this family has no free will?Yeah, absolutely. I see the film as being very Greek in that sense. This is absolutely inevitable, the family has absolutely no agency.

There is nothing Annie can do to stop this from happening?No, I don’t think so. That’s where the dollhouses came in. Annie creates these miniature figures and dollhouses and they served as a perfect metaphor for the situation; they’re dolls in a dollhouse being manipulated by outside forces. Any control they try to seize is hopeless.

Is that why she thinks she can stop it by burning the Charlie’s sketchbook – the first time she tries, she catches fire — but the second time, her husband Steve catches fire?Exactly. Even that scene is meant to play as Annie’s big redemptive moment, she’s going to sacrifice herself for her son. It’s a beautiful gesture but part of the cruel logic of the film is it’s an empty gesture. Ultimately, it’s not her choice to make. She thinks there’s a design here and she can end things if she sacrifices herself. But there’s no design and there are no rules. There is a malicious logic at play.

Could it have been prevented if she hadn’t been tricked into casting the spell given to her by Joan?The thing is, that scene is ultimately a red herring, and it’s a piece of misdirection. It plays as a séance scene but really it’s a much darker conjuring and they need Annie to take part in it in order to bring it in the house and in order to further this ritual along. When she invites it in, she escalates things. But it would’ve happened anyway, we’re just seeing how it happened. We’re seeing one of the ways it could play out.

There’s a lot of talk about what a bad mother Annie’s mother was. Did she just have kids for the purpose of this ritual?That’s pretty much what is suggested. If you listen to Annie’s speech at the group therapy, there are a lot of keys in her monologue as to what came before this and how far back this goes.

Early on, Charlie cuts the head off a pigeon and makes a strange figurine out of it. Can you elaborate on that?I don’t want to be too obvious but we find later that Charlie has been building these figurines to populate a diorama she’s been building that serves as a shrine to Paimon. It also functions as a metaphor for what Paimon is doing to this family. If you look at the diorama you’ll see they’re headless figurines bowing to a pigeon-headed creature with a crown on its head, which is not far away from what we’re left with in the last scene of the film.

Annie talks about how her mother got “her hooks” into Charlie at an early age. Are we meant to think Charlie is in on it?Charlie is the first successful host for Paimon. It’s transferred from Charlie to Peter at the end.

Because Paimon wants a male body?Exactly.

Is there ever a Charlie or is she Paimon from the moment she’s born?From the moment she’s born. I mean, there’s a girl that was displaced, but she was displaced from the very beginning.

In an odd way, that makes me feel better.(Laughs) That’s nice. See, it’s a happy ending. But obviously, there’s a boy who’s horribly displaced by the end.

http://www.vulture.com/2018/06/explaining-the-end-of-hereditary.html

Is Paimon a real thing?He is! Well, real in the sense that if you believe in hell and the Devil, Paimon is an actual entity that people do worship. Across various sources, he is designated as “a great King,” “one of the chief demons,” and “one of the most significant Angelick Rulers.” He pledges intense fealty to Lucifer, and is often rendered riding atop a camel (as we see in the movie).

There are conflicting points of view on whether or not Paimon and the demon Azazel are the same. According to the Black Witch Coven, “He is one of the demonic princes overseeing the four cardinal directions, West being his domain,” which is why Joan (Ann Dowd) and her minions “looked to the Northwest” to summon him in the movie. According to the Joy of Satan Ministries, “Paimon gives the power to influence and control others,” and that seems to scan with how he operates in Hereditary. However, the Ministries also describe the hell king as “full of energy. Loud noises and bright lights tend to make him more active. He is very colorful and very friendly.” Maybe the “party naked” side of him just got left on the cutting-room floor, because that guy seems like a downer.

Related Stories

Toni Collette Gets the Worst Inheritance Ever in HereditaryLet’s Talk About the Scene With the Car in Hereditary

What are the “rewards” Annie’s mom wrote to her about in that note?In the Invocations book that Annie pulls out of her mom’s box of things, a photo opposite the image of Paimon shows a person sitting atop a mound of treasure that says “Riches to the conjurer” in a caption beneath. When Joan speaks to Peter/Charlie at the end and crowns him, she asks Paimon to give her and the other followers “knowledge of all secret things, honor, wealth, and good familiars.” She also asks that he bind all men to them, as the worshippers have bound themselves to Paimon.

Those sound like “riches,” and what with a king of hell being resurrected, being recognized as one of his privileged followers will probably be a lot safer than, well, not. In a description of his abilities, Satan Ministries says Paimon “teaches the arts and sciences” in addition to providing “good familiars and gives one position and honor. He can reveal anything about the Earth and one’s mind.” At least some rulers recognize the necessity of science education!

So is Peter Charlie? Or is Peter Paimon?It’s likely that Charlie never knew she was imbued with the spirit of a king of hell, but as Annie says in her grief-counseling group, her mother got “her hooks” in the young girl from the time she was a baby. (Annie’s mom, Ellen, even insisted on feeding baby Charlie — and one of the miniatures depicts grandma offering the infant her exposed breast — which is probably the most unremarked upon insane thing that happens in Hereditary!) As we learn in the opening eulogy, Annie’s mom had “private rituals” and “private friends,” a lot of which probably revolved around putting Paimon into Charlie.

Clearly, though, the long game was to get Paimon into Peter, since Paimon desires a male host, and Charlie sure didn’t seem like she knew she was a preferred underling of the Morning Star! So Paimon was bound to Charlie, and when that little light flash dissolves into Peter’s limp body after he pitches himself out of the attic window at the end, that’s the spirit entering him. With the transfer complete, Joan seems like she’s ready to let Charlie (in Peter’s body) know about everything that’s been going on, and who she really is.

Remember, too, that Annie’s brother hung himself at the age of 16, leaving a note behind saying that his mother had been trying put people inside of him. Ellen failed to secure her son as a host, and she missed her first shot with Peter since Annie had excommunicated her, so she used Charlie as a temporary vessel until the ritual was able to be completed later on. As Aster told Vulture, “The film is about a long-lived possession ritual that is seen from the perspective of the sacrificial lambs.”

Related Stories

How Scary Is Hereditary, This Year’s Horror Hit at Sundance?Hereditary Director Ari Aster Answers His ‘Upsetting’ Film’s Burning Questions

With that in mind, you can think of the movie’s sinister events as being carried out by an invisible hand, of sorts. That sigil painted above grandma’s headless body in the attic? It’s the actual symbol of Paimon, and it was also carved in the utility pole that tore Charlie’s head off. The leafy bit that Annie brushed off her lip when she was drinking tea at Joan’s apartment? Probably a witches brew of some kind (or another red herring, because by now you’re paranoid!). Peter feeling his throat close up and taking the posture of Charlie’s decapitated body before ramming his head into a desk? His body was being primed for a spiritual takeover. Those scrapbook photos of Ellen wearing a white dress and a veil as she’s being showered with gold coins? That sure looks like a wedding ritual, once you see her framed portrait in the satanic tree house, which has a placard with “Queen Leigh” fixed to the top. Does that mean grandma was spiritually married to her granddaughter and therefore breastfed her husband-grandchild when she was an infant? It seems like it!

Did Annie do any of those weird things — decapitating her dead mom’s body, spying on Peter outside his window — or was it the Paimon cult?Aster told Vulture that, “The audience is supposed to suspect that it might be Annie (Toni Collette), but it is the cult of which Ann Dowd is a very significant part. But you are supposed to feel through the film that there are people on the periphery that are watching this family and are hovering just outside.” Therefore, Annie’s sleepwalking was not resulting in her exhuming bodies and cutting their heads off. It was a red herring! Aster laid a sort of bread crumb trail throughout the whole movie, tipping the audience off that the Grahams were always being watched by associates of Ellen and Joan: the man who smiled at Charlie at Ellen’s funeral, all those “new faces” who mourned her death, the woman waving at Charlie across the street from her school, the person breathing in the dark outside of Peter’s window — all of whom we probably saw naked in the tree house during the finale.

What was with that book setting people on fire?It seems like a safe bet that the book was bound to protect itself. The cult did demonstrate they had a pretty long reach when it came to influencing events, and they even stashed a whole headless body in the Graham’s attic when no one was looking. When Annie tried to destroy the book, it protected itself, but Annie was also essential to completing the possession ritual, so she couldn’t just burst into flames and die. We’ll call that a warning shot by the book.

But Steve (Gabriel Byrne)? He had to get out of the way, and the moment he died, Annie stopped being Annie and started being an agent of Paimon, much like when she channeled Charlie into her own body during the previous seance. When that ring of light flashes over her, that’s Paimon beaming into a new host, as Collette explained to Vulture, “Ari was standing to the side, and he let me watch this person be on fire for a while [laughs] and then he said, ‘Okay. Now, Paimon, the light, is going to enter you.’ We never talked about what that would ever look like or be like. I just did one take and that was it.” And that, ladies and gentlemen, is called acting.

Related Stories

Toni Collette on Hereditary, the Wildest Movie of Her CareerNo Kids Were (Permanently) Hurt While Filming Hereditary

What about Annie’s sleepwalking, then?Go with us on this one. What if the sleepwalking was Annie’s subconscious way of fighting her mother and the ritual? She tried to set Peter and Charlie on fire once before, but snapped out of it, right? And then in the dream we see where she admits she wanted to abort Peter but her mom wouldn’t allow it — and so she tried to force a miscarriage — she screams at him, “I wasn’t trying to kill you! I was trying to protect you!” Somewhere in Annie’s subconscious, she must have known her children were in danger, and just as her brother had to kill himself to escape Ellen’s clutches when he was a teenager, Annie must have known deep down that as long as the kids were alive they were existentially threatened.

As Collette told Vulture, in that moment Annie is surfacing what’s in her subconscious, which “allows the audience to know that this is a kind of murky, not entirely understood, gray area about the safety of her children and the intention behind the creation of them — and how her mother was involved, right? So it’s still not entirely clear, but there is an indication of some concern there.” Annie realizes after it’s too late, though, that she part of that threat, and must die if she wants to protect her kids. But by that point the toothpaste is out of the tube, and it just isn’t going back in.

Are the decapitations part of Paimon-related lore?Not really. Aster added that element himself, and he’s not into explaining why. As he told Vulture, “I think it would be disingenuous for me to give any sort of intellectual answer. I feel like there are a lot of really good reasons and I like all of them, but uttering them kind of robs them of something. But I do like all the things that they might provoke in somebody.” As for Collette, she has formed her own theory about all the rolling heads. “We’re so attached to our bodies, we’re so attached to the brain and the mind. They’re like the control center, and that once you lose that metaphorically, you become nothing, and therefore you are able to give yourself over to this greater force?” Speculate away!

So why did he use Paimon?No special reason, really. Aster said to Vulture that he just didn’t want to deploy Lucifer again, and hey, that’s fair. If you need a more substantial explanation than that — just let it go. Sometimes creepy is enough.