白天被工作烦得要死，下班回家就想看点轻松愉快的电视剧。余生等了将近三年，期间身边有许许多多人都在期待，还去看了小说，反馈比较平淡。所以也有担心剧最后的效果。但是今天的两集实在太让我惊喜了！真的是一开始就进入剧情了，男女主认识也很快，俩人相处搞笑得不行，全程我的嘴角都没放下来呜呜呜。小甜剧的颜值、甜蜜、搞笑、轻松、剧情都有啦！最后的小剧场绝对不能错过，简直就像顾魏和林之校在现实中谈恋爱呜呜呜，甜的要死。就是一部纯纯恋爱电视剧。喜欢，期待后面的发展。

本来你们团结一致可以把武雨泽和毕鑫业留下的，看过抖音武雨泽的直播，你们为了宣传第三部还一起吃过火锅的，怎么就不能团结一致？当时你们可是说过全员回归的，换了灵魂人物还是原来的味道吗？

你们怎么好意思跑到武雨泽家里吃火锅的？？？

换人了剧名为啥不换？你们永远也火不了。

你们说着毕鑫业留下的台词，看着换了人的路桥川，用着毕鑫业给你们留下的一切，却忘了没有毕鑫业谁认识你们这些所谓的演员。说你们忘恩负义不为过吧？

影片是对摇滚音乐史上一段传奇人物的复刻与致敬。

片名取自皇后乐队最具个性特色的歌曲《波西米亚狂想曲》。

影片重现了皇后乐队灵魂人物，主唱弗雷迪·默丘里（Freddie Mercury）神秘的人生轨迹：皇后乐队的组建、《波西米亚狂想曲》等标志性歌曲的创作过程、饱受争议的情感经历、辉煌与低谷之后的回归、病痛之后的重新振作……在影片最后，影片忠实复刻了皇后乐队长达20分钟的、足以纳入摇滚音乐史册的经典演唱会Live Aid现场。

【详细】

9905606

除了演技说剧情。很反映转型期的中国遇到的问题，传统观念传宗接代，女性出身农村到城市依附男人；现代社会男人事业成功出轨成本低，女性希望以美色钓金龟。妻子和小三都是感情的受伤者，剧情的巧妙之处在于，两个女性都没有错，本性善良。而剧中最有错的是丈夫，大男子主义，但无论哪种情况下，他似乎总是得利者，要么孩子，要么家庭爱人，似乎又很不公平。看剧时一直在不同角色的立场游走，伦理问题让人思考起来很痛苦。总之，社会转型期新旧观念并存，个人要把握好自己的价值观，对女性来说，自己的幸福要自己去努力的，这样才会更有主动性。第一步不犯错，便不会有接下来的纠结和麻烦，无论对人对己都如此。

这部韩剧设定和剧情很新颖，本片打着爱情的名义，讲述的是由一桩13年前的案件牵扯出来的媒体舆论问题。女主的设定说谎就会打嗝的匹诺曹。男主是13年前案件的相关人，和女主家有些千丝万缕的联系。女二是个特别的存在，不爱男主，萌，适当地出场缓和剧情。

剧中有这样一段话“人们都以为，匹若曹只会说真话。人们也都以为，记者是只会传达事实的。可无论是匹若曹还是记者都应该明白，人们会无条件相信他们所说的话，所以，他们应该明白他们所说的话比其他人的杀伤力更大，他们应该谨慎再谨慎才对，他们错就错在并不懂得这一点。他们的轻率，毁掉了一个家庭，所以当然应该让他们负责任。”

民众没有机会接触社会现实问题，而媒体充当了我们和社会的媒介，传播资讯、新闻的渠道。对于大多数民众来说，新闻报道、报纸刊登过的都是正确的信息，媒体的权威性意味着媒体人需要良好的新闻职业素养，新闻媒体应该从事实依据出发，而不是从利益出发。媒体人不能抱有太多世俗的偏见，不能带着预设看待新闻，出错的新闻不能放任，加以改正才是正确的选择。

社会上出现了很多报道失实，真假消息混在一起，出来的新闻三天后又出现新的反转。新闻不是故事会，由着你反转再反转。长此以往，真相是什么没人知道了，民众对于媒体的信任也会随之被磨掉。真相即使再渺小，也不该被歪曲。正义可能会迟到但不会缺席，也希望广大媒体能像达布那样为真相发声。

没有必要将这部《西线无战事》的故事再与老版的《西线无战事》做太多对比，故事是两个故事，但是带来的反思却是有一些接近的。

想专门为这部电影专门做一集播客节目，但是目前没有办法抽出时间。所以写一些自己的观后感，能不能发得出来，完全随缘。

我看完这部电影之后，中午出门吃了个午餐消化一下这些情绪，然后再重新回家看了一遍。

个人的感受是，这部电影在2022年的时代背景下应该拿一些奖项。

当我们重新回到一战的时代的话，会发现欧洲也将近有六十年无战事了。而六十年第一战则是人类历史上最血腥，丧失生命数最多的战争之一。

为什么这场战争这么血腥？

已经有很多历史学家做了很多的研究，各类思想家也做了大量的反思。很多研究都找到了其中的一个原因，这是人类进入工业化时代，第一场势均力敌，双方都有了现代工业化能力，都能够通过快速工业化的方式，将最大化伤害对方生命的武器毫无节制地推入战场，也能将双方的士兵通过工业运输的方式，拉送到战场变成灰烬。

我想这也是这部电影在前15分钟想要表现的含义，在战场上倒下的士兵，很快被掰下了铭牌，被专业化、工业化和高效地送入棺材，有专业人员专业地埋葬，他们的军服又以工业化地方式继续流转到清洗场，随意地在大缸里清掉一些血渍。还没有完全晾干，又被拖入了军服厂，小裁缝们修修补补，又到了新的一批对于战争兴奋无比的年轻的脸蛋手中。不管你是Andreas, 还是William，还是什么Hans或者Heinrich,在这工业化的战争面前，所有的名字和这个名字背后曾经曾经存在过的生命，以及他曾经拥有过的生活和智慧，以及这个年轻生命未来的可能性，一切都归为尘土。

而一旦穿上这样的制服，上到了这个如炼狱般的战场，就极难再走出来，即在一战中，大部分年轻的生命实际上从走上战场的这一刻，已经被判了死刑，有的如电影表现的活不过第二天天亮，也有的生命可能在停战前的最后一刻被终结。

而在停战前最后一秒被刺刀刺杀而被终结生命的男主，是对于这场战争意义的最大嘲讽。

那么这场战争具有什么意义呢？

我相信，那些在接到军服时兴奋不已的年轻人在经历了一年多的战争煎熬之后，可能早已不在乎了。他们只是想尽快尽早回到自己的故乡和家庭。

而对战争能够给家族和自己带来荣耀的将军则安全的在后方，策划着停战前的最后一击，以英雄的姿态，胜利终结这场战争。

当然电影也刻画了当时的德国社民党领袖则是在与法方福熙元帅的面前，放下了所谓的尊严和荣耀，所有和谈的目的都是为了能够尽快结束这场绞肉机般的战争。越早停战，就能省下尽量多的人的性命。我曾在我“理性批判”播客的第九期里提到过，德国社会民党有着老传统，能谈绝不动手，也是来自于这个对所有欧洲人都极其痛苦的历史。

当然这些德国社民党领袖在一战后也被“英雄们”认为是丧权辱国的，而这种屈辱感也再造了第三帝国崛起的基础。

作为一个学国关出身的人，我当然理解国际政治的残酷性以及实力说话的重要性，我也当然知道发展守卫自己主权国家的能力的重要性。

但对于战争本身，任何国家都应该慎之又慎还得再再慎重。因为这是拿一代国民的生命作为赌注的豪赌，同时这个赌注里还有未来数代国民的总财富将可能输为赔款。

至于英雄主义，在德国这个两次沦为战败国的国家，这类话题被德国思想家反复批判和反思的背景下，很难再被高歌颂扬。

【详细】

147601906

早早买了预售票，转了两趟公交去看Imax，观影途中我竟情难自禁地发出“智障”的感叹。观影结束瞄一眼淘票票，9.3，等到打开豆瓣，8.4。观影口味是私人的，但于我大多时候还是因为个人情怀给出虚高分数，而不是这种相反的情形，如此趣事，当浮一大白！

无论是企图往科幻外壳父子亲情内核的设定上靠还是试图表演一个拯救地球的故事，都太流于表面了。在观影过程里感受不到真实，也触摸不到激昂，全程自我感动自嗨，充斥着不合情理逻辑的假大空，加上时不时出来大刷存在感的中国新年，一部灾难题材竟然没有一点悲天悯人的情怀，缺乏合格的内核，而花里胡哨的特效也只是破袍子上的正常虱子，连华丽都谈不上，这部影片的塑造感受不到自然宏大，人类渺小。

缺乏诚信靠着黑吃黑的核心弄两件衣服离开地下城，已经千钧一发背负最后希望的军队竟然受不了几个同伴牺牲以至于破坏火石子弹相向，空间站的重要工作人物带酒的带酒，该休眠不休眠，身处空间站执行重要任务的中校宇航员脑子里只有小家没有全人类，将空间站所有地球已知动植物Dna等相关数据毁于一旦，全片从始至终充斥着诸如此类不遵守规则的雷人设定却还再三播放着“XX不规范亲人两行泪”的警示语，真不知道这是不是什么高阶sarcasm。

几个主角身世回述追忆过去满满感动中国套路，明明连单一故事都讲不好还要死气白赖地塞一些经典灾难桥段忆往昔峥嵘岁月，生怕自己无知一般往里灌着不痛不痒老态龙钟的动作和矫揉造作的亲情。

儿子多年来耿耿于怀于父亲草率结束了母亲的治疗使之丧命，有此设定却没有后续该有的儿子在灾难中找到了不为人知的真相（如果有的话）或者理解了父亲，于是父亲的形象又多了浓墨重彩的讨厌一笔，后续的情节发展父亲作死也变得跟伟大与牺牲毫无关系，只是一个无能又自私的油腻中年男人自我高潮的闪光时刻。赎罪？哈哈别逗了，没有哲学宗教思想内核的电影怎么会这种设定。

小毛孩子靠着一拍脑袋想起童年时蠢爹所讲氢气木星背景就扛起了大鼎，一群基础半吊子都算不上的小孩一没严谨计划二没合格技术三没合作默契（N??∞）力拔山兮气盖世力克一众科学家学者，末日面瘫无能少女剽窃了下班长那种洋溢着小学诗朗诵气息的智障希望排比句（关键也没排起来）就能把也不知道准备撤离到哪儿去的各国人召唤回来，然后你推着我我推着你熙熙攘攘都没啥工具受力点就把针推动了。

人物缺乏立体塑造，犹如提线木偶没有真实感，推进显得莫名其妙，集体躁郁症患者般一惊一乍（我可以发散理解长期身处极端天气身有重担的人精神压力大容易神经质的存在，但连这也没有铺垫），于是牺牲也变得无谓起来，好似打怪复活升级一般无足轻重。

全人类交给这群傻子当真是推倒重来还一个白茫茫大地真干净来得痛快！经过了十多年的恶劣生存环境，地下城的人类社会关系并没有取得正面发展，黑社会钻空子行贿腐败层出不穷，临灭绝了哄抢物资仍然比比皆是，这与姥爷回忆起的充满铜臭味的上海相比还更往野蛮走了一步。开倒车的社会扭转车头也是无穷无尽。

在他人几年之前就不再通过以战胜不可能定义自我的今天，这部所谓硬核科幻的目标仍然是这种方式，什么星辰浩瀚，什么无垠宇宙，都是空的。他人的灾难因人类活动而起，这部的灾难却是不再永恒的太阳。真有那日，就让头顶自私的宇航员毁掉全物种的奥秘，而满目疮痍的地球以及平庸的地球人一同苟延残喘于可笑的千年大计里，对于愚蠢自私目光短浅的人类，他们不配有瞬间而逝的痛苦与解脱，就让他们慢刀割肉，耗尽了世世代代的资源，日复一日地腐朽衰落，起起伏伏里曾有的希望最终都化为无有，重演者野蛮人的吃人故事，这种敲骨吸髓的痛苦流逝才是得以匹配的惩罚。

看此片时，隐隐约约觉得故事熟悉。看到有人资助Finnegan Bell去纽约，突然想起此片源自狄更斯的《远大前程》。影片中规中矩，被Estella征服而“玩弄”的Finnegan Bell还是牵起了Estella的手。爱情是可以跨越时空永远不变的吗？爱情是可以历经沧桑抚平伤痛的吗？是的。所以，看吧。何况片子里还有那么动人的音乐响起，还有Gwyneth Paltrow那美妙的身影和笑容。ps：最动人的片断当然是少年的Finnegan Bell喝破败的院落中尚清澈的喷泉水时，小Estella凑上去吻他的嘴。音乐倏然响起，两个小嘴甜蜜而幸福。那段迷人的曲声啊，正像那段青涩的爱情。

看哭了的电影，太好看了，直入心灵，大概每个男孩都有匹诺曹的优点——善良、勇敢，也有匹诺曹的缺点——贪玩、经不起诱惑，而每个父母都像匹诺曹的父亲那么爱孩子，每个人成长中总会遇到像狐狸和猫那样不好的人，也总有心灵天使如小仙女般守护以不入歧途，好吃懒做是会变成驴的，说谎鼻子要变长的，多么有趣的隐喻。特别推荐亲子观影。

其实剧情很老套，但是男女主都是生面孔，演技都还可以，所以还不错！搞笑的经纪人和美女搭档Lisa浮夸的表演真是笑死我??，罗马的人文风景拍的很棒，在许愿池投硬币许愿那个突然让我想到了蔡依林的布拉格广场，很棒的爱情轻喜剧！值得情侣??来看，笑点很多！其实两个人应该是没有任何交集的，经过一晚的相处，都对对方产生了感情，觉得有点太快了，难道真的是罗马月色旖旎，所以容易找到真爱？后面想一想，应该是女主带男主偷偷溜到罗马音乐学院的时候，两个人谈心的时候互相动了心吧！还好，最后两个人相遇北京又在一起了！完美的爱情轻喜剧

《人间恐怖》第2集，果然还是很恐怖。伊之助，一周去妓院8次。他说她被人喜欢上了，他不去，她会失落。尤其最近她看到他，总是很开心的样子。她到底是怎样的妓女啊？人美心善，好妓女。朋友菊次郎提醒他，不要中了美人计。这样说是有根据的。谁叫傻乎乎的伊之助把自己中了彩票二等奖的事告诉了她呢。她格外殷勤，会不会和这有关？伊之助当然不愿承认，女人只是看上了他唾手可得的财富，而不是看上了他的人格魅力。菊次郎灵机一动，设计考验一下这个女人吧。假装自己错杀了最好的朋友，自己要以死谢罪，对方愿不愿意和他一起死。伊之助听从配合演了这出戏。她确实没有足够的把握和自信，女人真的爱上了他。岂料，女人说好。女人摘下了头上的发饰，说都要死了，不如留给妓院里的可怜人吧。“你也留点什么吧。”听起来是那么有道理，伊之助拒绝不了，拿出了自己的钱袋子。他沉浸在感动里，沉浸在女人义无反顾的赴死里，他为自己的欺骗感到难为情起来。阿玉5岁就被卖到了妓院，应付各种男人，心力交瘁却常常吃不上饭。这样悲惨的身世，足够博得伊之助的同情，也让她觉得死并不可怕，反正自己一无所有，唯有伊之助的垂怜和信赖。如果女人真的愿意陪他去死，一起走到河的深处，不是做做样子，那么她就是真心的。他会兑换了彩票，赎了她的身，他会庆幸自己的好运。一手天降巨富，一手爱人入怀。这场考验，眼看要修成正果。只听噗通一声，水花声吓了伊之助一跳。天这么黑，伸出五指不见人，是阿玉跳河了吗？啊。他还来不及解释呢。这个信他爱他，愿意陪他去死的女人，他却怀疑她，他真是过分，真是该死啊。自责伤心懊恼慌乱后悔，不。来不及了。只见后面有两只手，突然抬起他的两条腿，他失去平衡，轻飘飘倾斜下去，在黑暗中泛起一个浪花。阿玉奔跑着，如此快乐如此匆忙。犹如仙境里的精灵，升级打怪了某种神奇的魔力，要回去告诉重要的人。她打开伊之助留下的钱袋。她心心念念的就是这张有魔力的纸啊。阅人无数，唯伊之助最好骗。一哄一探，便得知了他的惊天秘密。想要试探她？哈哈。你的演技太拙劣，我就陪你演一段。果然，女人心，心机深深。果然，小小伎俩反被将计就计。而阿玉，是那个运筹帷幄道高一丈的胜方。她真的胜利了吗？她永远失去了一个纯稚的男人，却兴冲冲跑进已经至少对3个女人说过娶之为妻的菊次郎家里。当她得意洋洋自己干了票大的，拿出那张象征财富的彩票晃悠时，菊次郎征住了。这不就是伊之助的彩票吗？他感到后背一阵发凉。原来伊之助喜欢的女子是他玩过的阿玉，原来这个女人将他的玩笑如此当真，像玩游戏一样随时转换面具，只为他们的幸福生活，添砖加瓦。他该庆幸，被一个女人如此当真地爱着吗？他该揭发，这个女人为爱的冲动和疯狂吗？他该怎样去面对那个心无旁骛又傻又实诚的伊之助？主意是他出的，出发点是好的，结果却是恐怖的死亡。伊之助是如此信任他，将他当成人生里可指点迷津的兄长。他不是直接凶手，却沾上了杀戮的血。且要当做什么都没发生，沉默着不安着，吃着人血馒头，享受既得利益者的一切，祭奠突如其来的圆满。这圆满，真的可以一直这么安静吗？他的心，阿玉的心，也会在城府算计中永恒吗？伊之助，被自以为是的爱背叛，被好朋友背叛，他的冤，如噗通时的水花，激荡菊次郎的心过。他编排了一个错杀故事，现实了他间接参与了错杀事故。而生活总归要恢复平静的，已经发生的还要撕裂伤疤吗？不如睁只眼闭只眼。那么只能可怜那个倒霉的青年伊之助了，太单纯的年纪里握着一张利益券，并不是好事啊。遇人不淑，人心险恶，见利忘义，便分分钟要了他的命。匹夫无罪，怀璧其罪。

两星全给男主人设和形象。

整个剧的氛围都是割裂的，前几集爱情喜剧，中间我以为我在看《如何患上抑郁症》或者《我和我的失联女友》或者《论包子主角一集能气死多少观众》或者《让影视剧走向无解只需要一个这样的剧情》又或者《全剧只有一个正常人是一种什么样的体验》，然后后期突然变成搞笑和解谈恋爱风，导演你是不是人格分裂不记得你之前导过啥了。。。

人物性格和行为的连贯性也是割裂的，完全理解不了男二和一众配角突然转变的契机是什么，基本上就是前一集还在霸凌女主，下一集我们都是好朋友??你跟谁俩呢？

额女主也是的，办的这事确实挺糟心的，都毁了人家职业生涯了，但是被人欺负是另一码事吧，真的看得我很郁闷。。一直在说好，对不起，我知道了。。。说她直球直率直脑筋吧，她又是啥事都埋在心里的类型，屁都不放一个，上帝视角真的很着急，真看不懂了，一集感觉剧情没啥进展就是女主哭哭哭，不说不说不说。。。男主和她谈恋爱那是相当累啊，虽然女主在抑郁症时期已经做的相对好了，（她那个时期不是抑郁症我是不相信的）

还有女二，不原谅的理由非常充分可以理解，没必要慷他人之慨。但是拆cp的是她——斩钉截铁威风堂堂地说不让他弟和女主在一起是正确的，并摆出各种理由。然后又很震惊人家真的分手了，我说大姐你干嘛呢，还有就是前面刻画她和男二的爱情也挺多回忆哇，怎么后面直接：我就是很讨厌你！。。。不是？？？男二干啥对不起她的了，就算不想谈了能不能早点跟人家说清楚，后面回来之前回男二信息那个桥段明显她已经放下了，那人家男二周周发邮件你是不能高抬贵手给他回一个吗？那怎么一看到直播就回了？？这什么怪人啊。。。我说编剧，能不能把人设前后统一一下啊，我以为我看漏了啥呢！这根本不连贯啊我吐！以及不要再洗男主爸妈了，多恶心的两张面孔，呕！我要是男主我特么就不稀罕这个家这几个家人，我直接扔掉，对我根本就没有爱，还硬要我离开唯一给我爱的女主，疯了吧，只有他姐的人生是人生吗？我不是人吗，我不需要爱吗？我也是爸爸妈妈的孩子为什么不能爱我？为什么不愿意给我爱还赶走我唯一爱的人，然后对我为别人的人生让路而表示感激。。。。真的看得我头疼，我速速化身男主舌战偏心父母。

最后一问：为什么，男女主要那么无私，女主有一句台词，别人的爱也很珍贵啊。啊对啊，谁说不是呢，那你男朋友的爱就不珍贵了吗，你自己的爱就不珍贵了吗，你们的感情是劣等产品是吧，不过安检吗？

转发 自观网 : 作为一个几乎不看电视的人，长假首日我突发奇想开始摆弄电视，打算约女朋友来家里一起看电影。电视盒子的推荐头条，赫然是一部之前从未听闻的抗美援朝战争电影——《特级英雄黄继光》。作为一个对相关影视作品较为关注的人，我努力回想这老宋体的古朴电影标题是否有过相关宣发，但是一无所获。于是便打开了前6分钟的试看。介绍相关历史背景的字幕，是大家所熟知的。而过往的军事影视剧往往有些令人失望之处，也让我对此类作品抱有很大的戒心——扮演黄继光的演员是个长脸，和雕塑、绘画形象上略有差别。开场时大量的奔跑镜头，是作为通信员的黄继光穿越美军的火力封锁线，虽然手持运动镜头拍摄很认真，给予我相当的身临其境感……但也能从炸点埋设与周边景物的互动，看出电影的制作条件并不是特别优渥。这部电影颇为独特之处，便是多条叙事的并行。这对编剧与导演要求颇高，如果转场生硬可能破坏全片的观感，而这部电影的多条叙事线的穿插与转场，非常成熟且恰当。伟大的中国人民志愿军战士，也是普普通通的中国人转变而来，这部电影将朝鲜前线的战斗，与黄继光在老家参军入伍以及训练相穿插，详尽介绍了黄继光的入伍动机，以及如何为永载史册的壮举做好准备。几乎每次看到电影里出现一个比较有戏份的人物，无需字幕介绍，我就能猜出来他（她）是谁，以及将会有什么样的剧情展开。

我的情绪，从最开始的戒备、疑虑，随着影片的展开，逐渐转为欣喜、感动——大哭之后，我无比振奋。作为战争电影，《特级英雄黄继光》无疑是优秀的，而作为以中国价值观讲好我们的故事，这部电影，是无论多少溢美之辞都无法描述的神作

16岁时看了阿拉伯的劳伦斯几乎要放弃拍电影

And when the film was over, I wanted to not be a director anymore because the bar was too high.

It was the first time, seeing a movie, I realized that there are themes that aren't narrative story themes. There are themes that are character themes, that are personal themes. That David Lean created a portraiture, surrounded the portrait with a mural of scope and epic action, but at the heart and core of "Lawrence of Arabia" is "Who am I"?

I started making movies when I was a young kid, but I remember the time I almost gave up my dream of being a movie director. I must have been 16.

越对什么事情感到自信或确定无疑，成果就越少

The more I'm feeling confident and secure about something, the less I'm gonna put out. The more I'm feeling, "Uh-oh, this could be a major problem in getting the story told," I'm gonna work overtime to meet the challenge and get the job done. All right, that's done. I don't know if it's worth it.

Spielberg:And so, I hate the feeling of being nervous, but I need to feel in this moment I'm really not sure what I'm doing. And when that verges on panic, I get great ideas. The more I feel backed into a corner, the more rewarding it becomes when I figure my way out of the corner.

Just before I went off to make "Jaws," I got to meet Henry Hathaway. He was kind of a tough-guy director, and he said, "There's gonna be moments where you're gonna get to the set and you're not gonna know what the hell you're doing. It happens to all of us. You've gotta guard that secret with your life. Let no one see when you're unsure of yourself. Hide that from everybody, or you'll lose the respect of everyone."

未见到的潜在危险更让人恐惧，细腻的心理层面

I knew that it's gonna take three or four weeks to rebuild the shark, and so we'd have to make up something else that didn't exactly show the shark but gave the sense the shark was near.

The barrels were a godsend, because I didn't need to show the shark as long as those barrels were around. What you don't see is generally scarier than what you do see, and the script was filled with "shark." Shark here, shark there, shark everywhere. The movie doesn't have very much shark in it.

John Williams:If the shark had been available visually, it might have changed the whole psychology of the experience.

青少年时期的自我认知，摄像机就是笔

I didn't have a lot of high esteem for myself, you know, growing up. I just was a lonely guy.

The camera was my pen. I wrote my stories through the lens. And when I was able to say "action" and "cut," I wrested control of my life.

But I didn't know anything about whether I was gonna have a career or where this was gonna go. I just knew that it filled up the time and it gave me a tremendous amount of satisfaction. And the second I finished a movie, I wanted to start a new one because I felt good about myself when I was making a film. But when I had too much time to think, all those scary whispers would start-- start up. It was not fun to be me in between ideas or projects.

遇到伯乐

"If you sign with us, I will support you as strongly in failure as I will in success."

对镜头语言的掌控

Steven Bochco:Steven had a gear in his brain that automatically translated words into pictures almost without it being a conscious process for him. There was a unique visual voice there that you had to not only pay attention to, but you had to give somewhat of a free rein to.

Edelstein:Right off the bat, it was clear that no one moved the camera like Steven Spielberg. Other directors had a fantastic sense of space. Orson Welles, you name it, people who understood composition. But the way that Spielberg's camera moved through a shot and then ended up somewhere that completely shifted or intensified the emotion of the scene, that was just a natural gift he had. Who knows where that came from. Who-- but it was his own technique.没人象斯皮尔伯格一样移动摄像机。其他导演有很出色的空间感。随便说一个Orson Welles非常理解构图。但是斯皮尔伯格在一个镜头中对摄像机的移动，以及在某一处停下来，完全改变或强化了场景的情感，那是他的天分。

George Eckstein called me and said, "Network's really upset that the truck didn't blow up, so they're ordering us to go back to that cliff and blow the truck up." And I said, "I'm not gonna do it." The death of the truck is so agonizing. I said, "I made that truck die slowly." The oil, like blood, dripping off the steering wheel. The wheel slowly rolling to a stop. The fan still going, but the truck's dying. I mean, it's the death of the truck. That's what the audience wants to see. This criminal element paying-- you know, paying the price for what it did to this man. I wouldn't do it. I wouldn't blow up the truck.

对表达媒介的熟悉

Bochco:For Steven, the little screen was an interesting canvas, and obviously he painted on it very well, but he knew that this screen simply wasn't a large enough canvas.

Spielberg:For me, directing is camerawork, and so I'm very on the front line of that. I've gotta set up the shot, I've gotta block the actors, choreograph the movement of the scene, bring the camera into the choreography, figure out when the camera stops, how it moves, how far it moves, what the composition is, so I've always got my eye on the lens, and that's what I do. I even pick the lens I want.对我来说，导演就是摄像技术，因此我总是在摄像的前线。我需要设定镜头，隔离演员的因素，为镜头设计动作，将镜头带入到动作中，确定摄像机什么时候停止，怎样移动，移动多远，构图是什么样的，因此我的眼睛总是关注在镜头上，那就是我所做的。我甚至会自己挑选想要的镜头。

Scorsese:His strength is really the ability to be able to tell a story in pictures instinctively. I sometimes watch his pictures on TV without the sound just to see the pictures.

Edelstein:Pauline Kael, one of the most influential film critics of all time, wrote in "The New Yorker" that Steven Spielberg had made one of the most phenomenal debuts in the history of film. She compared him to Howard Hawks in terms of how natural his feel for the medium was. What Kael saw in Spielberg was someone with a real movie sense, but she also said she wasn't necessarily sure there was great depth to go with it. She didn't see a sign of an emerging film artist like Martin Scorsese. What she saw instead was the birth of a new generation Hollywood hand.

幸运的处于一个活跃的文化氛围中

Spielberg:We were very, very fortunate to be part of that time. The culture was converging. It was filmmakers, it was artists, musicians, performers. It was an incredible, fertile time.

未曾有意追求电影的精神内核，自己的精神层面会通过工作渗透到作品中

I don't search for films consciously that have a spiritual core. There's a spiritual part of myself that happens to bleed over into the work, and so I subconsciously, which is the only choice that's important, will find things that inherently have something of a belief system that's beyond our understanding, that's a little bit out there.

人与人之间的联结

Coyote:For many years I wondered about the universal appeal of this movie, and one day, it hit me. There are no two humans on Earth that are father apart than those humans and that alien creature. And if Elliott, and the mother, and the little girl, and the scientist, could all love and empathize and make a rapprochement and a rapport with this creature, so, too, can any two humans on Earth, and I think that was a subtext that bubbled up through the film and must have touched something, because you don't get many films that are universally loved and appreciated 40 years later. And it spoke to something. Some desire to be able to reach across boundaries and touch other people.

对儿童演员的特别关照

Spielberg:I think all of my movies that have dealt with young people and their stories are about the importance of empowering these children to take control of the story, at least take control of their lives.我所有的电影都与年轻人和他们的故事有关，使这些孩子们更强大，控制故事的呈现很重要，至少他们可以控制自己的生活。

二战喜剧片带来的失败与挫折

But it was like I committed a war crime by making "1941." Everyone was eviscerating it. I was really devastated. Just that feeling of failure, that cold emptiness, where every reminder of the movie, you get that sick feeling in the center of your stomach, and you just want to go dig a hole and stick your head in it. I mean, for the next year, I put my head in a lot of holes. And my friend George Lucas came to the rescue.

自身的成熟，期待电影在更本质更人性方面的变化

Spielberg:I was looking for a different perception of myself. And if I didn't want to consciously make a departure and prove something, not just to myself but to everyone else, I might not have chosen "Color Purple" as my next movie. But it was my first really mature film, which took on, you know, substantive, humanistic subject matter. I was turning 40 and I was looking at life perhaps less optimistically.

紫色中本可以有更深入的表达

Spielberg:I got in trouble with several critics who didn't like that I shied away from the love story between Shug and Celie. And the scene where Shug Avery shows Celie, with a mirror, her vagina, that that did not go into the movie, which would've really changed the entire nature and tone of the film. I just didn't go for the full monty the way the book did. I might've done that had I made the movie 10 years later. I was just timid. I was just a little embarrassed. I just wasn't the right guy to do that.

对自己犹太人身份从拒绝到接受

I certainly experienced being excluded and being picked on and discriminated against. All I wanted to do was fit in. And by being Jewish, there was no way I could fit into anything.

I began to deny my Jewishness, you know, began to deny everything that I had accepted as a child and was not willing to accept if it was going to make me a pariah. I was ashamed of myself. I still feel ashamed of myself even remembering that long stretch of my life where I didn't want to be Jewish anymore.

辛德勒名单的基调

I tried to do it with no fancy tricks, no fancy lenses, no big Hollywood sweeping cranes. I tried to take all the tools with which I made so many of my films and just chuck them out the window. I never handheld anything, but I wanted to handhold as much of "Schindler's List" as I possibly could. I just wanted to create for all of us the feeling that we were absolutely there at the time.

光影的隐喻

Neeson:Oskar Schindler was a gregarious man. He was a second-rate businessman. Bit of a shady character, you know? A man about town, loved the women, loved his booze. A bon vivant, that's what he was.

Spielberg:Everything we do in this medium is about light and shadow, how the cinematographer lights the actors, lights the set. If you look at "Schindler's List," Amon Goeth was always lit beautifully. He always had that beautiful front light. You know, the guy was very clear. There was no mystery in him. You don't have to enhance his evilness, if you may say, by lighting. Now, if you look at Oskar Schindler, that was a confused individual. He came to Poland to make money, so it's always glamorous, but always shadowy. And then as the movie's progressing, he gets more frontal light. The shadows disappear.身为导演的情感投入，以及电影之外的社会互动

It was, emotionally, the hardest movie I've ever made.

Kennedy:That was a pivotal moment in Steven's life. He recognized he couldn't take any of the profits from the film. He wanted to give something back, so he started what became the Shoah Foundation, documenting that oral history and capturing history in a way that allowed people not to forget.

多面手

Robert Zemeckis:For a filmmaker, you can't have a better producer than one of the greatest directors in the world. He really nurtures young talent coming up. It's a pretty amazing roster. He's also a major figure in the television business. He started a restaurant. Dive! Submarine sandwiches. The man was, like, doing 27 things at once and being perfectly unselfconscious about it.

Geffen:I don't think Steven really fears anything. He's always ready to go and do something new.

拯救大兵瑞恩中镜头距离与观众心理感觉的关系，声效，应变能力

Spielberg:I tried very, very hard to put the audience as close to the experience as I possibly knew how to do so there wouldn't ever be a safe feeling in the audience. And when you narrow that distance-- if you're successful in narrowing the distance, then the audience really becomes those characters.

Edelstein:In "Saving Private Ryan," Spielberg understood the expressionistic possibilities of sound.

And if you're not Steven, if you don't have this lifetime of cinematic language in your head, that's a different kind of day. But because his eye is so connected to his brain and every movie that he's ever seen and every movie that he's ever made, he just went out and said, "Here's how we're gonna do this, and that's it." Incredible.

自身的情感挫折与电影作为治疗方法

It was complex for me for a long time, but at least I had a art form that I could filter it through. At least I had that. If movies did anything for me, it-- I've avoided therapy because movies are my therapy.

“无论怎样都要争取自由”的电影主题，爱国主义与理想主义

Insdorf:There are people struggling in one way or another for freedom in these movies. Give... us free. He doesn't take freedom for granted.

Spielberg:I really believe in this country, and I always have. And it just resonated throughout my work-- wanting to tell American stories, wanting to tell stories about principled, ethical people who, against all advice and against most everyone else's better judgment, just proceed to do the right thing. I'm sure that sounds like I'm this kind of, you know, idealist or some sort of a patriot, but I am a patriot. And I'm somewhat of an idealist, too.

讲故事的方法

Steven worked a long time to find where the story was to tell it.斯蒂芬会花很长时间去找在哪里讲故事。

保持中立

Spielberg:I felt I could not make this one-sided. And so, I knew it would be controversial from the very get-go.

Daniel Craig:This movie was trying to affect and turn on a debate. Is vengeance the answer? Does it actually solve anything? If you continue the cycle of violence and cycle of blood, then... that's what they'll be and nothing else. Steven was very keen to tell a human story, that these were men and not superheroes. Their indecision and their mistakes and their-- is the reality of what happened, you know? Life isn't a "James Bond" movie.复仇是否就是答案

叙事的方法

Kushner:You're in the hands of somebody who will always show you what you need to see in order to understand, on a narrative level, what's happening. And you'll also see a lot of things that will help you understand on deeper levels as well. And that sort of narrative device

电影带出的不确定性

Hoberman:The movie was perceived to be suffering from a sense of moral equivalence, which is really the bravest thing about the movie. It's looking for aspects of humanity on both sides of this conflict. Ambiguity is something that you don't normally associate with Spielberg's films, and "Munich" is the film where he went the furthest in the bluntness and the ferocity with which he approached that subject.

家庭，分离与重聚

Spielberg:Family is a big element in my life, which is why so many of my stories are about separation and then reunification. Even "Lincoln" is about separation and reunification.

工作团队的稳定，与他人合作，激励同伴

Williams:He understands that people and can serve him and how to synchronize his wishes with your own. He would've made a great general.

在看电影中不断学习

Kennedy:Steven looks at movies constantly and over and over and over again, referencing shots and framing and ideas. That's something Steven does all the time.Spielberg:Great filmmakers' works live on to create tremendous moments of inspiration. And so, one of the films I still see every year is "Lawrence of Arabia." The shots, the sheer vistas, and the portrait of such a complex character, it's pure moviemaking. 伟大的电影导演的工作是创造巨大的启发性时刻。自我审视中的过去，成长

Spielberg:Many years ago, Pauline Kael gave me a really great review on "Sugarland Express," but she said, "Whatever's on the surface might be all that is there. There may be nothing behind that." And she was absolutely right. I hadn't grown up yet through the movies. That was going to come in time.

到现在为止的评论

Maslin:Take a look at what he's done over close to 50 years. There's certainly a lot of variety. There are some things he's done that haven't worked, but there is absolutely nobody like him and no film career trajectory that is anything like his in the history of film. He speaks cinema as if it's his native language. He is so fluent in it that he does things that nobody else would dare to do and they are instantly recognizable as things that are purely his.

Scorsese:He has a dynamic sense of real filmmaking. I'm talking about filmmaking of--in the great narrative tradition of American cinema. 真正的电影制作的动态感

Coppola:Steven was blessed in that he could be commercial and he could do art.That's why I always compare him to a kind of George Gershwin, because Gershwin could write a Broadway show or he could write "Concerto in F." He could both, and very few people can do both. And Steven can do both. And that's a talent you have to be born with. 商业与艺术

宝子们答应我去看看好吗，一开始我也是带着吐槽和满满的不接受去看的，前4集都是第一部的快进模式，后面就逐渐变得精彩了，亮点都在Ming和Forth这两对上。

作为全员换血的第二部当然是免不了要跟第一部做对比的，尤其是普遍觉得第二部的颜值比不上第一季，心理有了落差，雀食啊！颜值方面可能是比不上第一部，但我觉得也没那么差啦！甚至觉得滤镜有很大的锅。第一部的色调明显清亮，就看着很舒服，第二部不知道为啥这个色调滤镜就“非常真实”。

首先说下Pha和wayo这一对，选角我是比较失望的，可能是God的颜值太高了？我觉得不是吧，从头看到尾，我其实已经将这部剧当成一部新剧来看了，但是依然觉得pha的选角有点失望，有点担不起校之月的名头，甚至觉得有点油腻。这版的Wayo，我真的要说声对不起，我大概是脑子抽了，越看越觉得像沈凌，并且逐渐代入…对不起对不起！要说第一部的wayo让人觉得是呆，这一部的wayo就让人觉得是傻，我个人是有点不太能接受wayo每次低头网上看，眼神乱飞的场景，莫名尴尬。也不知是剧本原因还是啥，这一对在这部里的互动我还是比较失望的。

第二对是Ming和Kit，一开始，我有点接受不了这对换人，甚至觉得钟阿晨才应该去演kit，后来觉得，开头我没立马接受设定，完全是发型师的锅，后期觉得高卿尘饰演的Kit别有一番味道，五官清秀，身量清瘦，还蛮适合的。比起第一部来，这一部更多的是害羞的别扭，让人想呵护。钟阿晨啊，我脑内的人脸识别又不自觉的开始匹配（真的很不好的习惯），觉得人笑起来有种马天宇的感觉，甚至觉得他长得有点像十几年前的我的表哥，hhhh！就莫名其妙的好感，总而言之在剧中，星星眼的痴缠小狗狗，还是蛮可爱的。

第三对Forth和Beam，这对一开始我也是拒绝的。实在是第一部选角太绝！至今对四哥四嫂难以忘怀！胡光平的四嫂太白净可爱了！能怎么办呢！Tae的四哥太酷了！浑身上下散发着成熟男人的美丽我能咋整？！但是！这部里让我最喜欢的，反而就是这一对。我本来就很吃这种设定嘛！尽管心中对Tee、Tae念念不忘！也完全不影响我喜欢这一对啊！看到很多人对Beam的选角非常的不喜，相信我，看下去，你会喜欢的！太甜了！三对中第一个完成全垒打，相处之中满满的虎狼之词，看的我是激动的凌晨亮点从床上弹坐而起！刚猛直男变身黏妻小达人。反正从第7集开始，我的嘴角完全上扬。

最后说下节奏问题，节奏确实很快，快的我还没有反应过来就已经结束了！甚至想让导演多添点戏份！宝子们，真的放下偏见，以对一部新剧的态度去看，真的会发现很多不同的地方，尽管会有不足的地方，但哪部剧能没有呢？

PS：Tee、Tae，少爷少奶奶都三搭了啊三搭！！！你们什么时候能再正儿八经的搭一次让我弥补下遗憾啊！QAQ！