刚看了三集,我不得不说,值得学习的地方太多了。品质不亚于电影,看这个对与自己作品的打造,简直就是教科书一样的存在,从人设,场景设计,到最后渲染,画面/动画表演,都非常优秀,不愧是DW/NF 共同出品的片子,要是我们也能做出可以从剧情/美术/制作能匹敌的就好了。
或许是看太多了日漫,人人都在看日漫,说实话,我不喜欢日本的动画和漫画,太啰嗦,太拖沓
刚看了三集,我不得不说,值得学习的地方太多了。品质不亚于电影,看这个对与自己作品的打造,简直就是教科书一样的存在,从人设,场景设计,到最后渲染,画面/动画表演,都非常优秀,不愧是DW/NF 共同出品的片子,要是我们也能做出可以从剧情/美术/制作能匹敌的就好了。
或许是看太多了日漫,人人都在看日漫,说实话,我不喜欢日本的动画和漫画,太啰嗦,太拖沓
第一,特效值两颗星,但我搞不懂那个村庄明显木属性水属性多,那条龙也是水龙,为什么特么龙鳞武器什么的都是橙红色的火属性,十环给男主也是橙红色的,主色调不应该是青蓝色吗?特效分再扣一星。第二,全片的选角,妆发效果都是西方人眼中的中国人面孔,作为一个中国人来看是真的丑(不针对演员),不是国人认知里的那种丑,是那种就是你一眼看过去很别扭,跟你日常见的国人脸不一样,就是一眼看到就知道是老外但又是东方面
第一,特效值两颗星,但我搞不懂那个村庄明显木属性水属性多,那条龙也是水龙,为什么特么龙鳞武器什么的都是橙红色的火属性,十环给男主也是橙红色的,主色调不应该是青蓝色吗?特效分再扣一星。第二,全片的选角,妆发效果都是西方人眼中的中国人面孔,作为一个中国人来看是真的丑(不针对演员),不是国人认知里的那种丑,是那种就是你一眼看过去很别扭,跟你日常见的国人脸不一样,就是一眼看到就知道是老外但又是东方面孔的那种别扭感,电影里妆容还强化这一点,真越看越不舒服。第三,明显看出来想讨好中国观众(感谢祖国的强大)。比如《卧虎藏龙》的竹林,成龙《尖峰时刻》的脚手架打戏。这些确实挺好的,还有终于不蹩脚的中文。但故事内核还是西方思维,比如男主最终想杀父亲的理由,你说父亲被蛊惑了大义灭亲我可以理解,但你特么是因为父亲仇家杀了母亲,所以认为是父亲带来的灾祸,并且父亲把他训练成杀手。这杀父理由真握草了。第四,这主角他妈死了,他在边上看。他爸死了,他在边上看。龙快被打死了,他抓着毛在看。憋了半天就最后放个大收人头,真不愧为杀手,就一人头狗。坐拥神龙之心的气加十环一点用没有。看到这就想起那沙比《功夫之王》,简直一模一样,就场景更中国风一点,主角变成自以为的东方面孔。内核还是一点没变,完全自娱自乐
戏剧需要夸张需要冲突是非常正常的事,也考验了导演和编剧对剧情的掌控。但是乡村爱情这个剧让人越看越没意思,角色来来去去,能成功的被大家又爱又恨的就只有刘能、广坤、赵四。浅析原因是因为人设稳定、特点鲜明、人物故事同质化程度低。
首先这个剧最让人感觉不舒服的就是爱情观及其统一的不成熟。一对一对的年纪各异的情侣,但出乎意料的因为相似
戏剧需要夸张需要冲突是非常正常的事,也考验了导演和编剧对剧情的掌控。但是乡村爱情这个剧让人越看越没意思,角色来来去去,能成功的被大家又爱又恨的就只有刘能、广坤、赵四。浅析原因是因为人设稳定、特点鲜明、人物故事同质化程度低。
首先这个剧最让人感觉不舒服的就是爱情观及其统一的不成熟。一对一对的年纪各异的情侣,但出乎意料的因为相似的事情感情出现危机。如果是差不多年龄和阶层的出现相似的反应,还能自圆其说,但从赵四媳妇和李文才跳广场舞就开始撕就显得特别幼稚了。因为赵四的人设不是为爱而撕的。同时王大拿和杨晓燕这对苦命鸳鸯,从头到尾就没好过,原因也很出奇的一致,王木生中间搅合。这一对应该是年龄较大的一对,感情既没有相同年龄段的广坤、刘能、赵四那么稳定,而且也是唯一一对不会成长的情侣。对比李大国和王香秀,两对的感情纠葛如此的相似,如此的同质。在看配角情侣里,皮长山和谢兰,之后的刘一水谢小梅和小蒙,王富贵谢大脚和王大拿,李大国王香秀和马忠,顺子夫妻和淘宝站的女员工,王大拿杨晓燕和老胡,赵玉田刘英和宏旭,等等,都是因为怀疑第三者问题吵了好多次。不禁让人感叹,是这个村里的人都不会成长,爱情观统一永远停留在幼稚阶段。最成熟的应该是永强和小蒙了。
本剧在爱情上人设塑造最成功的应该就是方正,活脱脱一个情种,这一部里非要给配一个对象,而且还成了,这不是毁了方正这个情种人设吗?而且情感变化之快速,缺少逻辑缓冲和情伤后的自我恢复,更缺少情感上的细微刻画。拍爱情剧,请好好去揣摩细品,把感情上的细腻表现出来好吗?拍喜剧,请把喜剧的内核是悲剧拍出来好吗?
还有其他大大小小各种情侣,我觉得他们没有感情戏,就写事业线的剧情一样可以把人物塑造的立体丰满,比如杜小双。为什么非要加那么多感情戏呢?浅析下来有那么几个原因:1.主线剧情单薄,戏不足爱情来凑;2.导演和编剧受资方影响,无法掌控剧本;3.导演编剧能力不足,缺乏真实生活体验,一味追求drama,但因能力不足drama变闹剧;4.角色过多,有一人得道鸡犬升天,有饭大家一起吃,有钱大家一起赚的嫌疑;5.低估观众审美和逻辑。
比起现在的乡村爱情,我更希望用一部电视剧的篇幅讲一对情侣的故事。穿插一些剧情来承上起来,来引进新人物,为下一部铺垫。不要在丑化东北农村了,别在消磨观众对国民饺子班的情怀了。
当时电影院和表弟表妹们看的。
电影开始没看懂。开头有点看不明白,后来就能看懂。镜头语言不强。
太平间那段歌,回去做噩梦了。
晚上躺着睡不着,好像眼前放电影似的。
没事看还行,不要太多期望。
如果把这个片当韩国电影看还能理解。有点照搬照抄了。有点土洋结合吧。韩国电影敢拍。电影故事发生在国外,不像国内。
当时电影院和表弟表妹们看的。
电影开始没看懂。开头有点看不明白,后来就能看懂。镜头语言不强。
太平间那段歌,回去做噩梦了。
晚上躺着睡不着,好像眼前放电影似的。
没事看还行,不要太多期望。
如果把这个片当韩国电影看还能理解。有点照搬照抄了。有点土洋结合吧。韩国电影敢拍。电影故事发生在国外,不像国内。
我看《九阴真经》是很久远的事了,暑假里,每日追看两集,那时候不认得姜大卫,倒是认得梁佩玲。梁佩玲古装不怎么好看,五官有点厚重,可是当年她曾被评为“天使面孔魔鬼身材”。第一眼看到姜大卫时没有惊喜,黄药师怎可以这么胖胖的——那时的姜大卫已经有点年纪了,微微发胖,离我当年心目中清癯形象的黄药师有点远。可是第二眼——姜大卫气定神闲含蓄内敛姿态潇洒眼神深邃,真正是成熟魅力的
我看《九阴真经》是很久远的事了,暑假里,每日追看两集,那时候不认得姜大卫,倒是认得梁佩玲。梁佩玲古装不怎么好看,五官有点厚重,可是当年她曾被评为“天使面孔魔鬼身材”。第一眼看到姜大卫时没有惊喜,黄药师怎可以这么胖胖的——那时的姜大卫已经有点年纪了,微微发胖,离我当年心目中清癯形象的黄药师有点远。可是第二眼——姜大卫气定神闲含蓄内敛姿态潇洒眼神深邃,真正是成熟魅力的男子啊,黄药师当如是。《九阴真经》的剧情印象已经很模糊了,若不是茉莉提醒,还想不起来柳溶月的名字,不过记得柳溶月和黄药师奉茶吹笛那一段,柳溶月的演员不是很美,打扮很精致。当年年纪小,没有为柳溶月感慨,只感觉她姿态漂亮,叫黄药师不要再来了——这也许是求而不得最漂亮的收梢。柳溶月有点像《金枝玉孽》里的香浮,香浮也是名妓,也是孙白扬的红颜知己,知道孙白扬爱上她人后对孙白扬说“以后不要再来了,我要做别人生意了。”原先她只等孙白扬一人。孙白扬和香浮的最后一幕是孙白扬远远看着香浮和别人调笑,她笑得风尘沧桑,可毕竟是笑着。孙白扬也会有一点惆怅吧。也仅此而已了。红颜知己们总是很美,善解人意成熟懂事温柔聪慧,可是那个人往往爱上别的女子。冯衡没有柳溶月风情,没有柳溶月温柔,没有柳溶月懂得说话——冯衡对感情也不知道进退,直接就认定黄药师是相公,她没有柳溶月懂得进退,拿捏分寸,也许反而会有一点可爱。柳溶月太聪慧了,或者可以说,太沧桑了,完全知道什么话该说什么不该说,什么话又该如何说——讨他欢心的痕迹太重,成为技巧,不够真,但是能让人舒服愉悦——所以,她适合充当红颜知己的角色。红颜知己听起来很好听,红颜,又是知己,都说知己难得——其实红颜知己是个很悲哀的角色,他有心事的时候会向她倾诉,会找她排解,受伤了也许还会找她治一治,可是他治愈创伤排解郁闷之后她永远不是他最重要的人,他身心健康精神奕奕地去找他爱的那个人了——红颜知己的作用,相当于花样年华中的那个树洞。以前看《流星蝴蝶剑》的时候不明白孟星魂为什么不喜欢高大姐却喜欢小蝶,杨紫琼风情万种,小蝶顶多算活泼天真。似乎所有的武侠书中风情成熟的那一个往往落败。现在渐渐有一些明白,因为男主角们本身的成熟,智慧,强势,兼男性本身的英雄主义情节——柳溶月,高大姐,风四娘们,注定了只能充当红颜知己。爱一个人往往会觉得那个人笨而弱小,怜惜而疼爱——她那么心明如境,成熟老练,嘴角有洞悉的微笑,她什么都明白,她只是没有说——很难让人爱上吧?
这是我看的露思的第三部戏了,从春花秋月,到陈芊芊,到喜欢你。市面上卖萌装傻假甜的女明星那么多,可露思不是这样的,我也具体说不出她和别的女演员有什么不同,但她的甜份和憨气恰到好处,一直都特别的真实。甜的如此让人揪心的,还有东宫的彭小苒。
一开始看她这部戏的预告,还在想露思为什么又接了这样的角色,憨傻的陷入爱情的少女,是非常不讨
这是我看的露思的第三部戏了,从春花秋月,到陈芊芊,到喜欢你。市面上卖萌装傻假甜的女明星那么多,可露思不是这样的,我也具体说不出她和别的女演员有什么不同,但她的甜份和憨气恰到好处,一直都特别的真实。甜的如此让人揪心的,还有东宫的彭小苒。
一开始看她这部戏的预告,还在想露思为什么又接了这样的角色,憨傻的陷入爱情的少女,是非常不讨喜的角色。因为憨傻演不好的话很容易就会变成真傻。而且她自己已经演了几次这样的角色了,居然还在继续接。除她以外不知道有多少女演员在演完这种角色以后被全网群嘲。
但第一集看完她说韩语的片段以后,我就又沦陷了(捂脸)。每次沦陷在露思的可爱里,都让我觉得自己的内核会不会是个老爷们?
第二个把我齁死的片段,是陆龟毛用自己的衣服把她遮住,然后露思开始疯狂的少女心喷发那一幕。陆龟毛走了以后,露思穿着他的鞋,绊倒在门槛上,然后还是甜兮兮的从地上蠕动起来趴在沙发上继续发梦。
这百分之百就是女人在陷入爱情时候的憨傻状态。精神也不正常了,智商也不在线了,理性荡然无存。没道理可讲,也不顾及旁人的眼光,一心一意,一心一意的就装着那个男人。
想起自己十七岁时发傻喜欢上的那个人的时候,一到雨天就犯鼻炎的我,忽然天天拼命的盼望着下滂沱大雨。因为下了滂沱大雨的话,全班谁也出不去玩儿,就只能够呆在班上,这样我就可以和他呆在一个空间里。
女人爱的时候越是这么憨傻,心碎的时候才会绞痛人心。要把美好的东西毁灭了,才算悲剧不是吗?
所以看她在餐厅娇羞的给陆龟毛拱自己做的琥珀核桃,才会让人那么动容。看她大哭着和服务员计较价格的时候,才真的揪心。
讲真好几年没在看爱情轻喜剧的时候看哭过了。但每次看露思的戏都能跟着哭。我觉得就冲这一点,我这个白嫖粉儿也得出来给她打个4星推荐。
我也觉得很可能她一直接这种角色是因为她可能有一部分是本色出演。但那又有什么关系,如果她本身就是一罐琥珀核桃,我干嘛要求她去演别的角色?
五个字概括这部戏,甜就完事了。
麦奇某些角度真的很有王校长的既视感,虽然明知道演员帅多了
德拉肯选角满分,还原度90%,龙尾巴画得丑点也没事
稀咲的表情太出戏了,整天强行扭曲个逼脸搁那笑,特别是留给麦奇的那个短手短脚的背影简直太逗,找个又瘦又矮的演员在霓虹应该不难吧
麦奇某些角度真的很有王校长的既视感,虽然明知道演员帅多了
德拉肯选角满分,还原度90%,龙尾巴画得丑点也没事
稀咲的表情太出戏了,整天强行扭曲个逼脸搁那笑,特别是留给麦奇的那个短手短脚的背影简直太逗,找个又瘦又矮的演员在霓虹应该不难吧
最后就是5小道,本来漫画就很讨厌废柴型男主,真人版更是长得也不行性格也不行啥啥不行
毕竟电影时长有限,又不像热血高校那种主题明确,打完小兵打boss的题材,特别是看了很多短评后发现该真人版对非原著党很不友好,很多人不懂这些不良少年的浪漫,为什么主角一下子有如此高的思想觉悟,为什么那个年代的人对暴力如此崇拜,以及暴走族和真正黑社会的区别,无妨,权当打发元旦假期,慢慢等漫画的最终话吧。
给第一集的火贺一星,还有一星给清原果耶看见同学起哄步美和火贺时的嘴角抽搐,以及最后一点点的演技大爆发,是没拿刀子走到外面之前的啊。
除此之外槽点满满,首先就是小时候在黑暗中绝望求救的步美,公史郎找人求救不让他去,让人家手一直扣扣扣到天黑,自此之后剧情超级崩坏。
给第一集的火贺一星,还有一星给清原果耶看见同学起哄步美和火贺时的嘴角抽搐,以及最后一点点的演技大爆发,是没拿刀子走到外面之前的啊。
除此之外槽点满满,首先就是小时候在黑暗中绝望求救的步美,公史郎找人求救不让他去,让人家手一直扣扣扣到天黑,自此之后剧情超级崩坏。
步美顶着海根的身体说在嘲笑她之前好好了解她,结果说完之后是让大家捏她脸???然后每个人都觉得好软就是快乐祥和的画面了???
还有步美身边的俩女生又是为何突然对海根友善,明明刚开始不让她酱酱的叫,哼!
黑暗恐惧症也要一个人在森林里打着电筒找人的女主,然后猜也不用猜肯定是这么伟大的女主要先找到,这个剧大家头发真的遭罪,总是淋雨,要么在天台被风呼呼吹
结局大家劝海根说的话真的苍白无力,后来海根妈妈上场,一上来就是一巴掌和第一集完美契合哈哈哈哈,大家都出去追拿刀的海根时,镜头给到一个人呆坐的妈妈,我以为后来总会说一说她为女儿的付出,比如晚上骑单车出去不是玩小钢珠啊,比如忏悔可能是自己给女儿有灌输变漂亮就能摆脱境况的观念啊,什么也没有,只是缓缓上前制止拿刀的女儿,我甚至在想后面那三个是害怕真的划脸的,所以只能安排才见几分钟这个陌生女孩的妈妈上场,毕竟妈妈是不会care脸的事的,划脸这个想法确实挺清奇,我以为拿刀是自杀来着,这一下要划脸可不就震慑住大家了嘛!
女主好圣母。
演女生的公史郎有点契合。
最后记还不错的台词一句 “平时拒绝别人,却想在需要的时候被爱,这也太自私了吧。”
怎么说呢,这部剧是我剧荒后看的第一部剧,题材挺符合我口味的,两个主角的颜值也挺能打,刚开始挺好看,花艺师这种还挺少见的,剧情给我一种偏奇幻的感觉,女二我很喜欢,颜值能打,性格特点鲜明,男主也挺ok的,角色不会让人出戏,演的挺好??,女主不是我喜欢的『剧里的人,不上升明星本人』,有点傻白甜的感觉,看到后面看不下去了,还有结局车祸挺无语……
怎么说呢,这部剧是我剧荒后看的第一部剧,题材挺符合我口味的,两个主角的颜值也挺能打,刚开始挺好看,花艺师这种还挺少见的,剧情给我一种偏奇幻的感觉,女二我很喜欢,颜值能打,性格特点鲜明,男主也挺ok的,角色不会让人出戏,演的挺好??,女主不是我喜欢的『剧里的人,不上升明星本人』,有点傻白甜的感觉,看到后面看不下去了,还有结局车祸挺无语……
虽然出自美国导演之手,然而这部科幻音乐剧拍出了相当纯正的英伦气息,红砖墙房子、浓重的英式口音以及鼎鼎大名的朋克乐队海报与唱片,仿佛时光倒流回德里克·贾曼和肯·洛奇作品中的70年代,这种英伦电影专属的时代感在风格化的摄影技术里还原出来。好几段延时摄影以及滤镜拍摄的场景,生动地描绘出主人公的生活背景和雀跃无比的兴奋心情。我没看过原著作者尼尔·盖曼(Neil Gaiman)的这部小说,但是这个改编
虽然出自美国导演之手,然而这部科幻音乐剧拍出了相当纯正的英伦气息,红砖墙房子、浓重的英式口音以及鼎鼎大名的朋克乐队海报与唱片,仿佛时光倒流回德里克·贾曼和肯·洛奇作品中的70年代,这种英伦电影专属的时代感在风格化的摄影技术里还原出来。好几段延时摄影以及滤镜拍摄的场景,生动地描绘出主人公的生活背景和雀跃无比的兴奋心情。我没看过原著作者尼尔·盖曼(Neil Gaiman)的这部小说,但是这个改编剧本成功捕捉到朋克群体与外星人的相似之处,并以诙谐流畅的手法展现出两个“物种”之间的沟通交流,进而互生情愫的离奇情节,便是整部电影妙趣横生的来源。没想到朋克与外星人两个群体使用的暗语里也有交集的部分,尽管彼此有着并不一致的含义,但是男女主角各说各话却能心领神会的段落令我着迷不已。还有外星人无法消化酒精而引发呕吐的设计,与普通人在疯狂派对后的情形如出一辙,实在令人脑洞大开而幽默感十足。而两者的父辈对子女的管教方式,无论是外星人的“吞食”,还是朋克做派的放任自流,都相当耐人寻味,令情节的高潮段落突然充满了现实隐喻的意味。当然,影片最精彩的莫过于朋克音乐。尽管我并非朋克乐迷,但是贯穿全片的经典曲目令人亢奋而喜悦,男女主角在台上表现的一段最出色,出神入化的动画效果,与歌词里的意境合为一体,尽管这纯粹就是MV的拍摄手法。妮可·基德曼出场不多,却以夸张的朋克教母造型以及幽默的诠释俘虏观众,女主角艾丽·范宁本身的外形就跟外星人有不少相似之处,跟《霓虹恶魔》里的表现不相上下,而最大的败笔似乎就是男主角了,感觉不到他身上有暴烈的朋克气质与精神,更像是斯文柔弱的邻家男孩,效果大打折扣。
荒诞派戏剧这个名词最早是由艾斯林提出来的,在两次世界大战之后,科技技术的进步无法给人带来幸福,再加上尼采以来,相信上帝已死的人数大大增加,因此人们原本宗教观念的崩塌,这个世界被剥夺了曾经它的中心和它的目的的东西。
西方社会在很长一段时间都是依靠基督教来进行秩序的维持,人们相信上帝,相信地狱与天堂,可是当上帝已死的概念提出之后
荒诞派戏剧这个名词最早是由艾斯林提出来的,在两次世界大战之后,科技技术的进步无法给人带来幸福,再加上尼采以来,相信上帝已死的人数大大增加,因此人们原本宗教观念的崩塌,这个世界被剥夺了曾经它的中心和它的目的的东西。
西方社会在很长一段时间都是依靠基督教来进行秩序的维持,人们相信上帝,相信地狱与天堂,可是当上帝已死的概念提出之后,人们的精神家园不复存在,我们开始不再清楚自己与宇宙的关系,我们似乎是被遗弃在这个世界之中。哲学试图通过理性逻辑来寻找世界的真理,可是人们发现所谓的逻辑与理性思维也是具有局限性的,是一种对于现实的伪解释。我们无法通过推理来了解到宇宙的真理。因此,荒诞派作家开始将自己对于世界的理解,因此将对于世界真相的探知伸向了禅宗佛教上的非理性层面。
而爱德华·阿尔比的戏剧《谁害怕弗吉尼亚伍尔夫》,通过描写乔治和玛莎与以及哈尼与尼克之间两对情侣在一昼夜所展开的戏谑游戏来展现一种接近于真实与虚幻的场面,从而契合于荒诞派戏剧对于人的信仰与精神家园的缺失所带来的彷徨。但是阿尔比并不仅仅执着于人所创造的来的幻觉试图麻痹自身,而是通过让乔治来说出儿子已经死的消息,让玛莎所代表的现代人真实的面对真正的人类状况,使他们免除幻想,因为这些幻想必然会不断造成错误判断和失望。
在阿尔比中的《谁害怕弗吉尼亚伍尔夫》,乔治说自己之前写的小说,儿子开车撞死了自己的父亲,而后来随着剧情的发展,这件事其实并不是小说的虚构,而是真实发生的。这样的一个情节构置,可以从阿尔比的童年境遇来解释,阿尔比小时候便是弃婴,从小便跟着自己养父母长大,在阿尔比的心中,他一直都对自己的亲身父母抱有幻想,这就契合了《弗》中乔治与玛莎之间在幻想中生存的状况,乔治一直逃避自己父母的死亡,玛莎一直幻想自己有一个儿子。这也契合了当时存在主义的观点,是一种行动与自我承担责任的伦理学,我们不能够永远消极生存在幻觉之中,因为这些幻想必然不断造成错误判断和失望。虽然在这样的幻想中,人们可以躲避真实的痛苦,在某种程度上获得了解脱,但同时也使人们丧失了思考的能力,失去了人最基本对于世界思考的权力。
荒诞派戏剧家认为话语背后的心理现实之间有一个巨大的鸿沟,因此潜意识具有更加广阔的现实性。从而通过这样的认识,使他们重新接近于看到他们自己真正的模样。因此我们常常可以看到在荒诞派戏剧中,动机的不可理喻性以及人物行动往往具有的无法解释的神秘性,有效地防止了认同。在尤涅斯库看来,荒诞派戏剧应该打破所谓的喜剧与悲剧,而应该让主题是忧郁的、狂暴的和痛苦的,但是却通过人物的行动来让剧场充满笑声。这样的写法也符合了人们在这个世界上生存不得不面对不同的矛盾价值模式。我们无时无刻不得不去面对人性的弱点与承受道德的崇高,面对信仰的覆灭与现代科学社会所带来的无望。
而阿尔比在《弗》中,我们无法理解为什么这对夫妻要举办这样一场无望的游戏,他们沉浸在自己的幻想之中,当他们沉浸在幻想之中,我们可以看到玛莎对于生活的希望,她试图通过与优秀的生物学家通奸,试图来掌控与压迫自己的丈夫乔治。在幻觉中,她是强势的,是乐观的,可是她的丈夫乔治在随着后来他在这样的幻觉中所受到压迫,他逐渐感受不到在这样的游戏之中,在这样的幻觉之中所能感受到的麻痹,而作者为了强化这样一场游戏的设定,他让四个人在剧中不断的饮酒,也是试图加强剧中人物的麻木,他们不再渴望知道生活的真相,因为真相只有无尽的痛苦,他们或许只是生活在自己的潜意识之中。
剧中人物的行动,很难可以看出人物的动机,这颠覆了传统以理性主义来编织情节的剧作手法,而是采用更加潜意识的,无逻辑的形式来发展剧情。使得所有的事件像是突然发生在舞台上,前后的逻辑也是联系疏远的,在本应该推进戏剧高潮的场面中,却利用一些技巧,甚至是直接忽略这件事,似乎上一件能够改变人物命运的事情从来没有发生活。哈尼和尼克为什么会来到乔治家参加这场游戏,为什么玛莎不停地打压着自己的丈夫,甚至乔治想要开枪射杀自己的妻子,却在开枪之后是一把纸伞,以及玛莎要当着自己的丈夫跟尼克通奸,其目的只是为了博取乔治的关注,可等到下一幕,一切又恢复到了常态,没有人在为这件事而争执。
但是在最后一幕中,《弗》也最终回到了现实,在阿尔比看来,当角色陶醉于虚幻的现实之中时,场面是躁动的,接近于狂欢的状态,人们的语言已经失去了意义,人物只是想尽办法去愉悦自身,任何矛盾都是能够调和的。而在最后一幕中,当真相被打破,回到最本质的真实,玛莎的状态与之前截然不同,他只能再次回到依靠自己丈夫的角色。这也表明作者对于人类被抛弃到了这个孤独的世界之时,所能依靠的只有人类本身,这或许便是阿尔比给予我们的答案。
Beyond food itself
Find the source of herself
What she truly wanted to express, a story to tell, a period of history to reflect
Beyond food itself
Find the source of herself
What she truly wanted to express, a story to tell, a period of history to reflect
Respect to the past
A whole new way of achieving success
就好像在回味着八十年代的辉煌,每一帧都布满灰尘和破旧老爷车。老梅浑身上下都充满着一股饱经沧桑的硬汉气息,好像一匹年老的孤狼在咆哮。尽管影片质量只能说是中规中矩,千篇一律的营救片,但每次当老梅骑着老哈雷出现在画面中心时,我心里总会一阵狂欢。
极简洁干脆,毫无拖泥带水,叙事的张力如此紧凑出色,甚至很难暂停去WC,从故事的层次来说,这绝对是很成功的电影,既有着浓重的西部片色彩,又不乏恰
就好像在回味着八十年代的辉煌,每一帧都布满灰尘和破旧老爷车。老梅浑身上下都充满着一股饱经沧桑的硬汉气息,好像一匹年老的孤狼在咆哮。尽管影片质量只能说是中规中矩,千篇一律的营救片,但每次当老梅骑着老哈雷出现在画面中心时,我心里总会一阵狂欢。
极简洁干脆,毫无拖泥带水,叙事的张力如此紧凑出色,甚至很难暂停去WC,从故事的层次来说,这绝对是很成功的电影,既有着浓重的西部片色彩,又不乏恰到好处的真实可信度。
中规中矩的惊悚片,沧桑老父营救白痴女儿的故事,大部分场景都在偏远小镇,让电影有了一种复古怀旧的味道,父女间的相处,鸡汤式的对话,构成冲突的点,都老套无新,还好追车的动作场面够带感,梅尔·吉布森潦倒邋遢的形象骑着哈雷机车,让人一阵喜悦,这是致敬更是追忆,回忆并且重温属于他的电影年代
首先不要问我为什么评论第五季,前五季一集不落,新出的有时间再狂补。
六个性格迥异的小马,吵吵闹闹不断发生纠纷却依然是最好的朋友,为什么呢?因为友谊的魔法。
无论你以前是多么的十恶不赦让人恨得牙根痒痒最后都可以成为朋友,为什么呢?因为友谊的魔法。
在这里友谊好像真的具有魔法一般,他可以让所有人重归于好,甚至可以保护世界。
首先不要问我为什么评论第五季,前五季一集不落,新出的有时间再狂补。
六个性格迥异的小马,吵吵闹闹不断发生纠纷却依然是最好的朋友,为什么呢?因为友谊的魔法。
无论你以前是多么的十恶不赦让人恨得牙根痒痒最后都可以成为朋友,为什么呢?因为友谊的魔法。
在这里友谊好像真的具有魔法一般,他可以让所有人重归于好,甚至可以保护世界。
最喜欢的外国动画没有之一,他们的那种友情,这种表现手法,是迄今为止国漫仍然无法企及的。
只愿所有幕后的人都能不忘初心一直拍下去?
何冰和几个老戏骨撑起的一部剧。剧情还是不够严谨,台词口误也不少,记得好像是在32集中,居然提到5公里...处汇合。我以为自己看错了,回退再看确实BUG。何冰的演技让我看完了整部剧。不得不说,没了何冰这部剧......就不好说了。不过比起那些青春偶像剧好了不少,可能是我老了。又或者对国产剧的要求太高了。勿喷,仅仅是个人愚见。
何冰和几个老戏骨撑起的一部剧。剧情还是不够严谨,台词口误也不少,记得好像是在32集中,居然提到5公里...处汇合。我以为自己看错了,回退再看确实BUG。何冰的演技让我看完了整部剧。不得不说,没了何冰这部剧......就不好说了。不过比起那些青春偶像剧好了不少,可能是我老了。又或者对国产剧的要求太高了。勿喷,仅仅是个人愚见。
男主我实在,唉……,面瘫演技了:
哥,咱们适当脸部表情夸张一点,我确实看到表情之间的差别了,也明白你的努力,但是感觉整个人都呆到极致了。开心不是只牵动嘴角,难过也不只是耷拉眼角,这样的演技要怎么以后长吃演员这碗饭啊。
特效,妖兽的特效你仿佛从页游随便抠下来粘贴上的,搞笑呢,无力吐槽,男频文改编的剧能不能走走心啊
男主我实在,唉……,面瘫演技了:
哥,咱们适当脸部表情夸张一点,我确实看到表情之间的差别了,也明白你的努力,但是感觉整个人都呆到极致了。开心不是只牵动嘴角,难过也不只是耷拉眼角,这样的演技要怎么以后长吃演员这碗饭啊。
特效,妖兽的特效你仿佛从页游随便抠下来粘贴上的,搞笑呢,无力吐槽,男频文改编的剧能不能走走心啊
这个导演比较不走寻常路,通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影,导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问,他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。
以下两个链接说得很清楚了:
这个导演比较不走寻常路,通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影,导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问,他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。 以下两个链接说得很清楚了: https://variety.com/2018/film/awards/hereditary-ari-aster-answers-burning-questions-1202841448/ And the fact the family is completely unaware adds to the terror.One way that I pitched the film when I was first taking it out was “it’s a story about a long-lived possession ritual told from the perspective of the sacrificial lamb.” Ultimately we are with the family in their ignorance of what’s really happening. But I also wanted to imbue the film with this sinister, more knowing perspective. Even though we are with the family in their ignorance, the movie itself knows exactly where the story is going. And everything is inevitable. Throughout the film, things are just sort of clicking into place and all those things are driving this family towards one end. In an early scene, the subject of free will is discussed. Are you saying this family has no free will?Yeah, absolutely. I see the film as being very Greek in that sense. This is absolutely inevitable, the family has absolutely no agency. There is nothing Annie can do to stop this from happening?No, I don’t think so. That’s where the dollhouses came in. Annie creates these miniature figures and dollhouses and they served as a perfect metaphor for the situation; they’re dolls in a dollhouse being manipulated by outside forces. Any control they try to seize is hopeless. Is that why she thinks she can stop it by burning the Charlie’s sketchbook – the first time she tries, she catches fire — but the second time, her husband Steve catches fire?Exactly. Even that scene is meant to play as Annie’s big redemptive moment, she’s going to sacrifice herself for her son. It’s a beautiful gesture but part of the cruel logic of the film is it’s an empty gesture. Ultimately, it’s not her choice to make. She thinks there’s a design here and she can end things if she sacrifices herself. But there’s no design and there are no rules. There is a malicious logic at play. Could it have been prevented if she hadn’t been tricked into casting the spell given to her by Joan?The thing is, that scene is ultimately a red herring, and it’s a piece of misdirection. It plays as a séance scene but really it’s a much darker conjuring and they need Annie to take part in it in order to bring it in the house and in order to further this ritual along. When she invites it in, she escalates things. But it would’ve happened anyway, we’re just seeing how it happened. We’re seeing one of the ways it could play out. There’s a lot of talk about what a bad mother Annie’s mother was. Did she just have kids for the purpose of this ritual?That’s pretty much what is suggested. If you listen to Annie’s speech at the group therapy, there are a lot of keys in her monologue as to what came before this and how far back this goes. Early on, Charlie cuts the head off a pigeon and makes a strange figurine out of it. Can you elaborate on that?I don’t want to be too obvious but we find later that Charlie has been building these figurines to populate a diorama she’s been building that serves as a shrine to Paimon. It also functions as a metaphor for what Paimon is doing to this family. If you look at the diorama you’ll see they’re headless figurines bowing to a pigeon-headed creature with a crown on its head, which is not far away from what we’re left with in the last scene of the film. Annie talks about how her mother got “her hooks” into Charlie at an early age. Are we meant to think Charlie is in on it?Charlie is the first successful host for Paimon. It’s transferred from Charlie to Peter at the end. Because Paimon wants a male body?Exactly. Is there ever a Charlie or is she Paimon from the moment she’s born?From the moment she’s born. I mean, there’s a girl that was displaced, but she was displaced from the very beginning. In an odd way, that makes me feel better.(Laughs) That’s nice. See, it’s a happy ending. But obviously, there’s a boy who’s horribly displaced by the end. http://www.vulture.com/2018/06/explaining-the-end-of-hereditary.html Is Paimon a real thing?He is! Well, real in the sense that if you believe in hell and the Devil, Paimon is an actual entity that people do worship. Across various sources, he is designated as “a great King,” “one of the chief demons,” and “one of the most significant Angelick Rulers.” He pledges intense fealty to Lucifer, and is often rendered riding atop a camel (as we see in the movie). There are conflicting points of view on whether or not Paimon and the demon Azazel are the same. According to the Black Witch Coven, “He is one of the demonic princes overseeing the four cardinal directions, West being his domain,” which is why Joan (Ann Dowd) and her minions “looked to the Northwest” to summon him in the movie. According to the Joy of Satan Ministries, “Paimon gives the power to influence and control others,” and that seems to scan with how he operates in Hereditary. However, the Ministries also describe the hell king as “full of energy. Loud noises and bright lights tend to make him more active. He is very colorful and very friendly.” Maybe the “party naked” side of him just got left on the cutting-room floor, because that guy seems like a downer. Toni Collette Gets the Worst Inheritance Ever in HereditaryLet’s Talk About the Scene With the Car in Hereditary What are the “rewards” Annie’s mom wrote to her about in that note?In the Invocations book that Annie pulls out of her mom’s box of things, a photo opposite the image of Paimon shows a person sitting atop a mound of treasure that says “Riches to the conjurer” in a caption beneath. When Joan speaks to Peter/Charlie at the end and crowns him, she asks Paimon to give her and the other followers “knowledge of all secret things, honor, wealth, and good familiars.” She also asks that he bind all men to them, as the worshippers have bound themselves to Paimon. Those sound like “riches,” and what with a king of hell being resurrected, being recognized as one of his privileged followers will probably be a lot safer than, well, not. In a description of his abilities, Satan Ministries says Paimon “teaches the arts and sciences” in addition to providing “good familiars and gives one position and honor. He can reveal anything about the Earth and one’s mind.” At least some rulers recognize the necessity of science education! So is Peter Charlie? Or is Peter Paimon?It’s likely that Charlie never knew she was imbued with the spirit of a king of hell, but as Annie says in her grief-counseling group, her mother got “her hooks” in the young girl from the time she was a baby. (Annie’s mom, Ellen, even insisted on feeding baby Charlie — and one of the miniatures depicts grandma offering the infant her exposed breast — which is probably the most unremarked upon insane thing that happens in Hereditary!) As we learn in the opening eulogy, Annie’s mom had “private rituals” and “private friends,” a lot of which probably revolved around putting Paimon into Charlie. Clearly, though, the long game was to get Paimon into Peter, since Paimon desires a male host, and Charlie sure didn’t seem like she knew she was a preferred underling of the Morning Star! So Paimon was bound to Charlie, and when that little light flash dissolves into Peter’s limp body after he pitches himself out of the attic window at the end, that’s the spirit entering him. With the transfer complete, Joan seems like she’s ready to let Charlie (in Peter’s body) know about everything that’s been going on, and who she really is. Remember, too, that Annie’s brother hung himself at the age of 16, leaving a note behind saying that his mother had been trying put people inside of him. Ellen failed to secure her son as a host, and she missed her first shot with Peter since Annie had excommunicated her, so she used Charlie as a temporary vessel until the ritual was able to be completed later on. As Aster told Vulture, “The film is about a long-lived possession ritual that is seen from the perspective of the sacrificial lambs.” How Scary Is Hereditary, This Year’s Horror Hit at Sundance?Hereditary Director Ari Aster Answers His ‘Upsetting’ Film’s Burning Questions With that in mind, you can think of the movie’s sinister events as being carried out by an invisible hand, of sorts. That sigil painted above grandma’s headless body in the attic? It’s the actual symbol of Paimon, and it was also carved in the utility pole that tore Charlie’s head off. The leafy bit that Annie brushed off her lip when she was drinking tea at Joan’s apartment? Probably a witches brew of some kind (or another red herring, because by now you’re paranoid!). Peter feeling his throat close up and taking the posture of Charlie’s decapitated body before ramming his head into a desk? His body was being primed for a spiritual takeover. Those scrapbook photos of Ellen wearing a white dress and a veil as she’s being showered with gold coins? That sure looks like a wedding ritual, once you see her framed portrait in the satanic tree house, which has a placard with “Queen Leigh” fixed to the top. Does that mean grandma was spiritually married to her granddaughter and therefore breastfed her husband-grandchild when she was an infant? It seems like it! Did Annie do any of those weird things — decapitating her dead mom’s body, spying on Peter outside his window — or was it the Paimon cult?Aster told Vulture that, “The audience is supposed to suspect that it might be Annie (Toni Collette), but it is the cult of which Ann Dowd is a very significant part. But you are supposed to feel through the film that there are people on the periphery that are watching this family and are hovering just outside.” Therefore, Annie’s sleepwalking was not resulting in her exhuming bodies and cutting their heads off. It was a red herring! Aster laid a sort of bread crumb trail throughout the whole movie, tipping the audience off that the Grahams were always being watched by associates of Ellen and Joan: the man who smiled at Charlie at Ellen’s funeral, all those “new faces” who mourned her death, the woman waving at Charlie across the street from her school, the person breathing in the dark outside of Peter’s window — all of whom we probably saw naked in the tree house during the finale. What was with that book setting people on fire?It seems like a safe bet that the book was bound to protect itself. The cult did demonstrate they had a pretty long reach when it came to influencing events, and they even stashed a whole headless body in the Graham’s attic when no one was looking. When Annie tried to destroy the book, it protected itself, but Annie was also essential to completing the possession ritual, so she couldn’t just burst into flames and die. We’ll call that a warning shot by the book. But Steve (Gabriel Byrne)? He had to get out of the way, and the moment he died, Annie stopped being Annie and started being an agent of Paimon, much like when she channeled Charlie into her own body during the previous seance. When that ring of light flashes over her, that’s Paimon beaming into a new host, as Collette explained to Vulture, “Ari was standing to the side, and he let me watch this person be on fire for a while [laughs] and then he said, ‘Okay. Now, Paimon, the light, is going to enter you.’ We never talked about what that would ever look like or be like. I just did one take and that was it.” And that, ladies and gentlemen, is called acting. Toni Collette on Hereditary, the Wildest Movie of Her CareerNo Kids Were (Permanently) Hurt While Filming Hereditary What about Annie’s sleepwalking, then?Go with us on this one. What if the sleepwalking was Annie’s subconscious way of fighting her mother and the ritual? She tried to set Peter and Charlie on fire once before, but snapped out of it, right? And then in the dream we see where she admits she wanted to abort Peter but her mom wouldn’t allow it — and so she tried to force a miscarriage — she screams at him, “I wasn’t trying to kill you! I was trying to protect you!” Somewhere in Annie’s subconscious, she must have known her children were in danger, and just as her brother had to kill himself to escape Ellen’s clutches when he was a teenager, Annie must have known deep down that as long as the kids were alive they were existentially threatened. As Collette told Vulture, in that moment Annie is surfacing what’s in her subconscious, which “allows the audience to know that this is a kind of murky, not entirely understood, gray area about the safety of her children and the intention behind the creation of them — and how her mother was involved, right? So it’s still not entirely clear, but there is an indication of some concern there.” Annie realizes after it’s too late, though, that she part of that threat, and must die if she wants to protect her kids. But by that point the toothpaste is out of the tube, and it just isn’t going back in. Are the decapitations part of Paimon-related lore?Not really. Aster added that element himself, and he’s not into explaining why. As he told Vulture, “I think it would be disingenuous for me to give any sort of intellectual answer. I feel like there are a lot of really good reasons and I like all of them, but uttering them kind of robs them of something. But I do like all the things that they might provoke in somebody.” As for Collette, she has formed her own theory about all the rolling heads. “We’re so attached to our bodies, we’re so attached to the brain and the mind. They’re like the control center, and that once you lose that metaphorically, you become nothing, and therefore you are able to give yourself over to this greater force?” Speculate away! So why did he use Paimon?No special reason, really. Aster said to Vulture that he just didn’t want to deploy Lucifer again, and hey, that’s fair. If you need a more substantial explanation than that — just let it go. Sometimes creepy is enough.Related Stories
Related Stories
Related Stories
我专门下载豆瓣、注册账号就是为了给这电影评个10分!
方方面面都很真实,泪中有笑、笑中有泪!每个人都演的很真实,不会因为他们之前那么多作品而出戏!
冷檬的演技大幅度提升,王炸这么沙雕都让我有点感动,茅台演的可恨??闰土更可恨,锅盖头还是那么搞笑!小明的播音腔和被
我专门下载豆瓣、注册账号就是为了给这电影评个10分!
方方面面都很真实,泪中有笑、笑中有泪!每个人都演的很真实,不会因为他们之前那么多作品而出戏!
冷檬的演技大幅度提升,王炸这么沙雕都让我有点感动,茅台演的可恨??闰土更可恨,锅盖头还是那么搞笑!小明的播音腔和被茅台打得那一巴掌直接给我笑喷了,球球拌丑一下子都没认出来??
电影情节有点跟重楼别承上启下的感觉,致敬喜剧之王的部分特别好!