目前看到最新更新的11集。

先说说优点，第一，老妖演唱的op《迷途》加了很大的分，从开头的吟唱那种恐怖气氛就起来了；第二，动画色调很舒服，很切合盗墓的基调，光线的切换也是对的，镜头语言在线（记得有一个镜头是光线把老痒的脸切分得一阴一阳，就是一个老痒身份的隐喻）；第三，剧情编排也不错，不算书粉，五六年前看的小说现在只记得大致剧情了，但每一集在最后都会留下一点悬念，这个节奏感是对的，个人很喜欢在西湖喝酒那段。第四，老痒的人物塑造很对位，寸头，乍看有点凶狠，有点痞气但不是小流氓，实际很有头脑，口吃这点配音老师把握得特别好，让我喜欢上老痒了。

再说说缺点：本CP粉觉得在这部里面加入小哥毫无意义，完全就是南派为了拉人气改的。因为秦岭神树是唯一一部没有小哥和胖子靠吴邪自己破解迷局的，是小三爷的高光体现，结果动画改设定，暗示凉师爷是小哥，然后还在暗中保护吴邪两次解救他于危难关头，这么改除了溜瓶邪粉我想不出别的理由。不要跟我说什么小说是第一人称看不到凉师爷的暗线，动画从第三角度入手加设定是正确的，人物和故事是需要铺垫的，如果徐磊一开始就设定凉师爷是小哥假扮的，那么一定要留下一点线索，比如吴邪见到凉师爷总觉得有什么不对劲，或者小说后四部铁三角聊天的时候小哥透露了他去过秦岭神树遇见过吴邪；小说里面连暗示都没有东西在衍生作品出现就叫改设定。更何况还把小哥画崩了，下巴尖得要戳死人，还有红眼设定完全无法接受，黑发黑眼不香吗？然后就是吴邪的形象营造得太男神了，脸好看脑子聪明还临危不惧话少，前期的吴邪在我想象中应该是长相比路人好看点，天真机灵但遇事还是会怕同时脑子里疯狂刷弹幕的，感觉主创似乎要把它往高冷男神的方向去塑造。最后，感觉恐怖氛围渲染得还不够，大家都在刷的“老痒他妈缝纫机”这段剧情在老痒的讲述中轻飘飘地就过去了，还不如在op中的3秒有存在感，烛九阴画得有点像个大长虫，在青铜树中睁眼时没有给人地狱之眼的压迫感。

完结再继续写吧。

————21.7.4更新

周末抽空看完了最后两集，跟前面评价一样大差不差，吴邪发现解子扬尸体和老痒诱导吴邪在黑暗中想象恐惧的东西这两段挺有感觉的。

小哥出场了，嗯，还是接受不了这个尖下巴，有点脱像了，后面云顶天宫还继续的话请动画组好好优化吧。整体7.7分。

其实，电影表达一个人的真实想法是很困难的，制造氛围让演员最大的自由发挥，才是最好的表演。看多了洪尚秀，总觉得是关于一个女人的故事，没有情节，顺水推舟的发展，通过闲聊照顾一下空旷的场景，在散漫中，让观众去意会、填充。这大概是因为过于抽象，所需要的互动吧，在他的电影里，吸烟，是一个不可或缺的标志，男人女人都很享用烟草给与的自信。这也就是韩国的风格，不拘于环境，不拍成风光片，而是靠实实在在的街巷，那种烟火气，拉近观众，看在这样真实的环境中，人们无聊的打发时间的方式，跟你我一样。但咏鹅，却又增加了许多幽默因素，两位演员的自然表演，几乎很生活，在慵懒散漫的片子主题下，有些新颖，因为明星的加盟，也因为影片潜在的张力，人物关系在变化，也很有故事可看，期待姐弟恋的实现？期待群山故事的继续发展？一对儿，变成2对儿恋人，一切都有可能。这就是这部电影的最佳，意犹未尽。在仅仅两个小时的片中，我并没有觉得枯燥，反而希望在进行下去，其实生活是多变的，永远不停歇，没有一个固定的答案，正因为如此，再慢散的生活中，才有慎重、才有期待、才有可能，它所倡导的是慢节奏，在现实中，它是不可或缺的却又真的很难得的体验。

你想拥有读心术、随时随地了解其他人所思所想吗？

是不是觉得这种超能力很酷，再也不用去猜别人真正的想法了？！那如果是别人拥有这种超能力呢？再或者你们互相都有呢？再也没有尔虞我诈与勾心斗角？你懂我懂大家懂？是不是有点《黑镜》的味道。。。

剧透小能手荷兰弟刚出的电影（Chaos Walking）《混沌行走》正是在这样的科幻背景下，在不远的未来，人类在与地球相似的遥远外星建立了新家园，但由于这个星球上存在的一种“噪音”病毒，使得男人感染后可以听到其他人和动物的心声，隐私变得透明；在这个异星球长大的男主托德（荷兰弟饰）为了保护来自地球的女孩维奥拉，开始了一段危机重重、解锁星球暗黑秘密的冒险之旅。剧情或复古科幻，或莫名混沌。。。

就不剧透了，一起看看我在下面总结的 6 个常见的英语表达吧~~~

1 buckle up 系好安全带

【详细】

13838632

原文出自《影像之书》官方press kit，此处刊载美版press kit中的译文。

Dear Jean-Luc,

Thank you for your invitation to see The Image Book (...)

You have recreated pictorial matter from various sources and formats. Deformed, re-colorized, enlarged by the grain, and re-framed.

Blocked all seduction of images, text also, stuttering, quavering, interrupted, covered up.

In the constant interruptions, being split between what is represented and the machine of the cinematograph, with its unspooling, its perforations, its decomposition.

Rediscovering discontinuity by digital means.

The beautiful and accurate definition of counterpoint gives a key.

Waves, flames, bombardments, armies, history and the world as a thundering spectacle à la Dovzhenko, or Vidor.

A great symphonic surge. But not to tell as story. Not longer truly ‘cinema’. As per the first reader of Moby Dick (according to Giono):

- This is not a book - No, said Melville.

This is not something to make you popular, in the face of digital, digital that shows all, and nothing behind. (I experienced this on Vigo’s films, and hope to have avoided it in the end).

That’s assuming that what you say is heard. That is what is astonishing in your film. “It is becoming necessary to draw attention,” in fact. But it hasn’t been shown like this; said, occasionally, with Victor Hugo’s “government of wild beasts.”

Marx invented remakes with his Louis-Napoleon. History repeats itself, but here, not as farce. Moral errors get confused with crimes of the States. There are criminals who exist only because of war. Humanity is destroying itself. For years now, war has been everywhere, more and more literally, in the sense of Goya or Joseph de Maistre’s (this is how we explain the presence of the latter). Habituation follows.

To say that The Image Book is an act of courage, that it is unprecedented, is a platitude. But this is the feeling that keeps coming back to me.

It is true, as the young people who write to you in Lundi matin say, that you are the only one who, etc... (They don't know how right they are, I’m curious for them to see this one).

You have always been “in” history, since you consider that that is what cinema should serve.

From Histoire(s) on, this was what it was always about, first and foremost, more than cinephilia telling its little stories (not bad!)

This time the matter itself, is history. In fact you’re not turning away from cinema, it’s simply no longer a dominant love. It is as useful as the printing type case from which Fuller’s illiterate typesetter finds the characters, at top speed.

And you, you keep the character, the hieroglyph of which Eisenstein dreamed. (He too, his three apparitions are magnificent: the owl, the hands on the bible and the Teutonic knight. He wanted to build his cathedral of the Arts, all by himself. His resistance was already that of hope, and his solitude too)

You find all the images in films, and shabby newsreels. It’s only justice. All the better if Ridley Scott serves to fill a printing type case. And to not have turned your back on cinema, the two long shots from Le plaisir suffice, where we see moving bodies, giving a definition of precisely that. Thought evolves through images and sound ("a thought / will come / to be continued"), as in a collage a friend had made using texts from the screen of Histoire(s). It is a bloc, and it is articulated like the five fingers... another one of these things I didn’t understand on paper.

Lastly, even if the re-uses of Histoires are what I am least curious about - one doesn’t change his handwriting - I very much like the idea of immortality through liquid films, from Vertigo to Ruby Gentry by way of The River. And the peaceful moments of a happy Arabia where I see something of Barnet’s joy: sunset, a boat on the glittering sea, the banal corners of the Maghreb playing for the whole of Arabia, the Arabia we have behind our eyes. Again, thank you.

Warm regards,Bernard Eisenschitz (Critic, Historian, Director)

press kit下载：https://4f399d350e4882ff73b9-0f00c87f9e216dcd5acfbe5f7dfb64d7.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/production/documents/Godard%20-%20Image%20Book%20Press%20Kit.pdf

（记于周五夜的第二场）

1. 终于的 可以肆无顾忌的开始泰迪熊2 满足.

2. 不得不承认的是 在我比预想额外拓展情节时 我已喝醉.

（第二天的周六夜）

3. 我昨晚一定是醉了 否则怎么会没截图.

【详细】

14732385

從第一季開始Bosch和Chandler作對，到第五季兩個人總算是走到最近。這裏其實是一個重要的反題，也就是“爲了個人心中的正義一個人可以走多遠”。第三季嫩Holland，Bosch也就是默認了Chandler這個不擇手段的做法，結果發現他自己也是個不擇手段的人，到了生死關頭這兩個人反而是整個LA價值觀最接近，合作最沒有違和感的人。這裏可以結束了，下一季做Dollmaker的話要把Chandler也嫩死了……

Irving雖然是他的老上級，但是Bosch也看不慣他爲了私憤而私設公堂的做法（這裏非常諷刺的是，Irving好心辦了壞事害了他兒子，卻反過來以私奉公；Bosch對Gunn見死不救，往好了說是他不知道Gunn竟然會被殺，往壞了說是因爲LA沒法懲治他所以他乾脆一石二鳥用Gunn和自己做餌私設公堂，至少他還是站在被道德審判的一方）；Edgar本人也不是什麽善茬（原作裏直接有説，第二季的case有暗示他在經濟蕭條期也和Nash一樣打過兼職，或者也知道退休警察那些見不得人的事），Billets爲了升職把自己的人際關係搞得一團糟，至於FBI更加是一塌糊塗，直接和國安暗通款曲。

個人最遺憾的是，第四季結束怎麽就沒學使命召喚，在機場旁邊放個肩扛飛彈把一飛機紅二代打死呢？