台湾的中学也是到处都是标语啊。“自由”的字样有点讽刺。

舍监比教导主任还凶。

老师眼中分数才是一切。

学生宿舍很整洁，有点军营的味道，显然是因为舍监的强势管理。

特权生就是一个靶子，一方面是向学霸、好学的人树立一个前进的榜样，另一方面却会引发不公平而招致仇恨孤立。

即使是这样高压的学校，校园欺凌仍然存在。难道不应该学生所有的霸凌、觉醒都是死于高压的吗？

片子后面的所谓反抗，很幼稚，想起了《我的少女时代》等台湾电影都有类似的桥段，还有国产青春片学过。（该片监制就是《少女时代》的监制。）

个人觉得处理成个体学生反抗而牺牲，唤起家长、社会的醒觉才是，或者类似《熔炉》那种。

男主某些角度像刘烨。

少有在台湾片看到恬妞。虽然她是台湾人。

估计当时拍片子的导演到现在也没想明白当时是怎么琢磨这剧情的。本来是黑色幽默，现在是魔幻现实。如果有人给这片子来个混剪。然后把今天这些领导每段讲话，啥吴梁这些垃圾都剪进片子。组长肯定也得有个人，震改疫。群众还是片子中的群众。开会还是这样开会，效果就拉满了。只可惜现在群众都知道过程，就等着看结果。

这么多年看着自己曾看过的网络小说一部部改成电视剧或电影播放出来，其实真的很无奈。这些剧集要么改的面目全非、要么制作粗糙，迄今也就张翰、赵丽颖那部《杉杉来吃》前面部分比小说好。然后就是大家都觉得拍的很棒的《琅琊榜》，再其它的就差强人意了。今天给大家说的这部《炮灰攻略》，虽然对小说改编了不少，但并不是大杂烩乱来一气，而是有章法有主线的。导演还是很有想法的，编剧还三观正，思路算近年网剧里的小清流了，演员都是群真正的年轻人在演，而且还是群很努力演好的年轻人，没绯闻没丑闻，颜值也在线。导演的那个一镜到底，经费在燃烧啊，特效也做的不错，比很多所谓的大IP不差，绝对过了5毛??。这剧最奇葩的是连群演都好抢镜??，还有很多小细节都处理的很细致，武术指导居然让看多了特效的我觉得好像回到了武侠时代（动作还蛮漂亮，近期楚原导演拿到终身成就奖，引的我又看了些老片的拍摄花絮，正好看到香港83年射雕英雄传王扶林导演翁美玲那版，武术指导程晓东拍武打片段的花絮，那些武打镜头到现在都不过时，能带动你热血情绪的打斗），当然本片武指还是有进步空间的，但就现如今大环境来说，该片武指还是值得一个赞的，有点难度的打斗动作演员亲自上阵的看到的机会不多哦，大家快来看吧！最后说下这剧是轻松搞笑又反套路又开心的小清新剧，不狗血哟，还可以吐槽，打发时间不伤脑顺带学习正能量满满怼人的剧。当然也有些小瑕疵，但瑕不掩瑜嘛！还在纠结与原著差异大的同学们，看看别的剧再回头看看此剧，是不是没那么刺眼了？再抛开当番外看，是不是又觉得挺可乐的了？我还是很期待原班人马第二季的，这样钱都用在刀刃上，尊重观众尊重自己的剧组，我很珍惜！

【详细】

9596877

原文出自《影像之书》官方press kit，此处刊载美版press kit中的译文。

Dear Jean-Luc,

Thank you for your invitation to see The Image Book (...)

You have recreated pictorial matter from various sources and formats. Deformed, re-colorized, enlarged by the grain, and re-framed.

Blocked all seduction of images, text also, stuttering, quavering, interrupted, covered up.

In the constant interruptions, being split between what is represented and the machine of the cinematograph, with its unspooling, its perforations, its decomposition.

Rediscovering discontinuity by digital means.

The beautiful and accurate definition of counterpoint gives a key.

Waves, flames, bombardments, armies, history and the world as a thundering spectacle à la Dovzhenko, or Vidor.

A great symphonic surge. But not to tell as story. Not longer truly ‘cinema’. As per the first reader of Moby Dick (according to Giono):

- This is not a book - No, said Melville.

This is not something to make you popular, in the face of digital, digital that shows all, and nothing behind. (I experienced this on Vigo’s films, and hope to have avoided it in the end).

That’s assuming that what you say is heard. That is what is astonishing in your film. “It is becoming necessary to draw attention,” in fact. But it hasn’t been shown like this; said, occasionally, with Victor Hugo’s “government of wild beasts.”

Marx invented remakes with his Louis-Napoleon. History repeats itself, but here, not as farce. Moral errors get confused with crimes of the States. There are criminals who exist only because of war. Humanity is destroying itself. For years now, war has been everywhere, more and more literally, in the sense of Goya or Joseph de Maistre’s (this is how we explain the presence of the latter). Habituation follows.

To say that The Image Book is an act of courage, that it is unprecedented, is a platitude. But this is the feeling that keeps coming back to me.

It is true, as the young people who write to you in Lundi matin say, that you are the only one who, etc... (They don't know how right they are, I’m curious for them to see this one).

You have always been “in” history, since you consider that that is what cinema should serve.

From Histoire(s) on, this was what it was always about, first and foremost, more than cinephilia telling its little stories (not bad!)

This time the matter itself, is history. In fact you’re not turning away from cinema, it’s simply no longer a dominant love. It is as useful as the printing type case from which Fuller’s illiterate typesetter finds the characters, at top speed.

And you, you keep the character, the hieroglyph of which Eisenstein dreamed. (He too, his three apparitions are magnificent: the owl, the hands on the bible and the Teutonic knight. He wanted to build his cathedral of the Arts, all by himself. His resistance was already that of hope, and his solitude too)

You find all the images in films, and shabby newsreels. It’s only justice. All the better if Ridley Scott serves to fill a printing type case. And to not have turned your back on cinema, the two long shots from Le plaisir suffice, where we see moving bodies, giving a definition of precisely that. Thought evolves through images and sound ("a thought / will come / to be continued"), as in a collage a friend had made using texts from the screen of Histoire(s). It is a bloc, and it is articulated like the five fingers... another one of these things I didn’t understand on paper.

Lastly, even if the re-uses of Histoires are what I am least curious about - one doesn’t change his handwriting - I very much like the idea of immortality through liquid films, from Vertigo to Ruby Gentry by way of The River. And the peaceful moments of a happy Arabia where I see something of Barnet’s joy: sunset, a boat on the glittering sea, the banal corners of the Maghreb playing for the whole of Arabia, the Arabia we have behind our eyes. Again, thank you.

Warm regards,Bernard Eisenschitz (Critic, Historian, Director)

press kit下载：https://4f399d350e4882ff73b9-0f00c87f9e216dcd5acfbe5f7dfb64d7.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/production/documents/Godard%20-%20Image%20Book%20Press%20Kit.pdf