【教官x若兰|李连杰x叶芳华】！！！！！！他俩太好嗑了！！！！！他俩都曾是黑暗势力中的棋子，再相逢时，两人之间说不清道不明的情愫暗涌，“教官”，她这样唤他，他回过头来，犹如故人归，那白鸽从手中逃脱，眼神里已没有往日的狠绝，一如春水般的温和，明明只是普通的两个字，也仅仅是拥抱而已，却显得既危险又暧昧，带着些不可说的禁忌意味。。。电影里关于他俩的片段并不多，回忆也是寥寥几笔，一闪而过，他曾是她的老师，教授她取人性命的技巧，无心无情，也曾舍命相救，也只有与他在一起时，才能瞧见她带着真心的笑意，再次相见大概已是多年以后吧，他想做个好人，早已厌烦往日打打杀杀的生活，她慵慵懒懒的泄下一头黑发，“我们都回不去的”，她被挟进车里，看着一群手下给他的教训，不动声色，嘴角微微上扬，狠绝的笑意，致命又蛊惑，或许是期待着以前的老师能够“回来”？事实证明，他把她教的很好，出手狠绝，干净利落，她赢了，伸出手，幽幽淡淡，“跟我回去吧，教官”，自然是不可能的答案，一切即将尘埃落定时，看着崔西紧紧拉着他，她却突然想起了从前，曾几何时，他们也是这样，可明明是她先，扣动扳机的手渐渐松开，终归他是她的老师，她输的心甘情愿，只是不知道最后的那一刻，若兰有没有听见他唤的那一句“若兰”呢？唉??

丁柔：律政处高级检察官（大律师），气质型美女，专业能力强、独立、自强，做事非常讲原则，外冷内热，经济条件不错（第一部开始就有房有豪车），无不良嗜好，平时下班喜欢呆在家里看书。

于在春：初时是律政处检察官，后离开律政处自己开律师楼，大律师兼老板，为人风趣幽默、头脑灵活、专业能力强，工作时非常认真和平时完全不同，外表一般，还算高大，做事有自己的一套原则，比较大男人，嘴巴很损，但心肠很好，经济条件一般（没房，欠周志辉钱），烟酒不离手、经常泡吧。

一开始就是在春追丁柔，但那时丁柔是李国柱的情人，在春知道后只能无奈放弃，但还是有意无意讥讽加讲道理，想让丁柔不要再错下去。我是无法理解为什么丁柔这样的人会去做别人的情妇，不知道图啥，可能那时候的丁柔真的喜欢李国柱吧。后来因为去旅行和织毛衣的事情，丁柔和李国柱吵架后情绪不稳出了车祸，在春在丁柔情绪极度低落时，乘虚而入和丁柔发生了关系。可能因为这个不好的开始吧，加上在春在这段感情中本身的不自信，所以他老是会怀疑丁柔。他们两个互动非常有意思，看到他两我基本上是嘴角向上的，每次镜头一给到丁柔家的那栋楼时，我就非常期待他们两个的互动，这样能坚持4部已经非常难能可贵了吧。

总结一下他俩闹矛盾主要事件，第一部，在春见自己前女友，从这件事可以看出，丁柔醋劲也不小，但硬是啥也没说的逼着在春发誓再也不见前女友。

第二部是李国柱回来，在春吃醋，在春觉得丁柔对李的余情未了还单独约会肯定还有一腿，这在丁柔看来，简直是在侮辱自己，吵了一架，分开一段时间，以在春道歉收尾。

第三部因为结婚的事情，在春离家出走，期间也是经常查岗，翻垃圾，觉得丁柔肯定收藏了其他男人，最后实在放不下回头言归于好。

第四部终于结婚了，在春就像现在的七大姑八大姨一样，没谈恋爱的时候催谈恋爱，谈了恋爱催结婚、结了婚催生娃。这次因为生娃和移民的事，两人不欢而散，丁柔去了美国。在春开始了出轨生活。丁柔从美国回来后，可能在美国想的比较多，丁柔回来之后改变很大，更关心在春，在春很晚回来会给他留门，担心他晚回家肚子饿，给他弄吃的，同时自己心脏问题也有好转，开始备孕。一切都在朝着在春希望的方向发展，但在春刚刚尝到偷食的快乐，不愿结束，过着家里红旗不倒，外面彩旗飘飘的生活。但偷情就这样，刚开始很刺激、新鲜，但随着两人的心理包袱越来越重，偷情继续不下去了，还是分了手。但就在这是被丁柔发现，丁柔完全不能接收这件事情，离婚收场。

光看两个人的性格，觉得一点也不配，在春大男人，丁柔典型的大女人。在春很八，整体叽叽歪歪，丁柔话不多，但逻辑清晰，总能以最少的语言切中要害。

在春认为自己在这段感情里一直处于弱势，甚至剧里面其他人这么以为，很多观众也这么以为。但1-4部看下来，还真不是这样。第一部丁柔结束了和李国柱的关系，这多多少少和在春有关系。丁柔一直不愿结婚，认为结婚会多了责任，责任多了夫妻反而没有情侣相处起来轻松，事实上的确如此，但最后他们还是结婚了。丁柔开始不想这么快要小孩，认为时机和条件不成熟，但还是经不住在春的软磨硬泡，哪怕生小孩有生命危险，还是愿意尝试。她还越来越关心在春的情绪，照顾他的生活。我仔细观察了一下，前三部里，在家里做饭的都是在春，结了婚之后，做饭的都是丁柔，就一场在春做饭，还是因为给情人煮了，心生内疚才做的。这段感情里，丁柔看起来很强势，却是一直在做改变的那个。之所以让在春、剧中人和观众有错觉，是因为在春喜欢唠叨，喜欢宣泄，他能很轻松的把自己的烦恼，想法分享给别人，而丁柔却有什么都直闷在心理，她不是很善于把自己的私事拿去麻烦别人。在春不同，他可以因为内心的烦恼，整夜整夜的烦着兄弟们，在春是何等幸福，有群这么有爱的兄弟们。其实丁柔和在春性别互换一下，感觉更符合他们的性别特点一些。

在春出轨，按照他的说法，是觉得丁柔给他很大压力，他的压力主要是丁柔很自我，自己的事喜欢自己做决定，这就是特别独立的人在亲密关系中的不可爱之处。但是从第四部，我看到的是在春结婚和没结婚生活变化不大，一样抽烟喝酒泡吧，玩的很晚只需要说一声就行，他们也没有经济压力，丁柔大概率没让他养。可以说，丁柔给了他一个已婚男人可以拥有的最大自由，金钱自由、时间自由，基本对他没什么要求，除了爱和忠诚。在春啊，你不可能要求一个给你那么大自由的女人，同时又什么都顺着你，粘着你，这两样本来就是矛盾的。

可能丁柔给他的自由真的过了火吧，在春以出轨的方式背叛了这段婚姻。丁柔应该从来没想过在春会这么做，她对在春太信任，即使从美国回来后，在春因为内疚对她特别好，她虽然也感觉到老公的不正常，但做梦也没想到他会出轨，所以丁柔知道之后才那么决绝，因为内心很痛，被最信任的人背叛是最痛的。

在春的确很爱丁柔，但是他在这段感情里没有成长。他觉得爱一个人就和她在一起，然后结婚，然后生孩子 。但他从头到位都觉得丁柔不是很爱他，但他依然一门心思想结婚。结了婚自己的生活变化也不大，就想顺其自然想当爸爸，但完全没有考虑过自己是不是准备好了去当一个爸爸，至少都第四部了还欠着志辉的钱，应该也没什么积蓄，但每天任然过着单身生活。夫妻间有问题，就用出轨的方式来逃避，岂知这样做，对丁柔这样自尊心很强的人，是最伤的。丁柔宁愿他提出离婚，而不是出轨。

这可能真的是男女不同的地方吧，婚姻出现问题，男人不会想离婚，但是他们可以通过冷暴力、出轨等方式来应对。但当女人觉得这段婚姻没有意义，就首先想离婚，所以据说80%的离婚是女性提出的，可能就是这样原因吧。

以前看剧的时候，一直相信第四部结尾他们已经和好了，我太喜欢他俩在一起的感觉了，他们那个温馨的家（yd的小窝）简直是我快乐的源泉，恋人和夫妻能这样相处一辈子，真是太有意思了，不是吗？毕竟许多现实中的夫妻结婚几年后除了孩子的事，交流都快没有了。春柔CP这种相处模式真的很幸福啊。但这次看的时候，我不太确信了，因为我真切的感受到了丁柔的心痛和终于明白，在春的出轨是对丁柔多么的不公平。我心释然！

这部电视剧给我感觉就是一群神经病在演戏，女主角每次被人威胁，都是智商低下，还每次都姑息养奸……还有这部电视剧的编剧，明显是在迎合没啥见识的中老年家庭妇女的心理，各种不合理的巧合和作为，各种比惨，简直无语=_=！这种电视剧能够出现在电视上，审核部门的不作为也是可见一斑了，还有我严重开始怀疑这部剧拍出来就是为了洗钱用的，不然真的是毫无意义的，只能骗骗中老年家庭妇女！我只想问为什么没有负分可以评？

由于最近央8又在重播这部剧 我一股怒气上了心头 就这三观不正的剧居然好意思一直重播 被强奸怀孕女主死活要把孩子生下来 被嫌弃的男主跪着求着要当接盘侠 作天作地的钱晶晶把人好好一优等生害到进监狱还不敢去坦白 这什么编剧才能写得出这等烂剧 我爸妈每天都指着央8看电视就成天看的这玩意 宣传的什么三观 让多少人看了恶心 姐夫强奸小姨子怀孕还要生下来最后难产去世 真绝了

↑↑我看了前三集，然后跳到第九集。这部剧完全没有带颜色的镜头，它就是一个探讨家庭、宗教与犯罪、青春期心理的作品。我个人觉得是一个挺纯粹的剧，可以看作是《天堂旗帜下》的姊妹篇。二者都有反思现代宗教的意味。

↑↑世界上绝大多数人处于爱和信任匮乏的状态。已经得到的爱和信任容易消退，尝过滋味的人更容易贪婪，所以爱和信任往往很稀缺。一个人一旦带着充足的爱和信任，占据某人的内心，那很可能长久占据一席之地。到这一步，此人想要伤害被他俘获的人，轻而易举。

↑↑世上最痛苦的事，可能就是曾经给你满溢的爱的那个人突然抽身而去，如果这是对方处心积虑，则没有任何办法可以防备。爱，突然之间得而复失，内心的空虚、塌陷感无可抵御，只能任由占据主动的那人控制自己。

↑↑最要命的是，爱和信任是合法、合道德的。只要猎手有足够的耐心，在动手前隐藏好自己，则一切都对他有利，没有任何力量可以阻碍他施予别人爱。

↑↑本剧通行的翻译是《家庭之友》，我个人译为《善邻》。故事发生在一个宗教氛围浓厚的地方。如果教区有潜在罪犯，这是一个完全不设防的地方，可以利用宗教气氛肆意侵略他人。剧中的摩门教，早期就有宗教领袖多妻、娶幼女的典例，后世教徒也难保没有意欲效仿者。

↑↑青少年要想免遭剧中罪犯的毒手，就必须自己爱自己，自己相信自己，做自己的主人。永远不要做任何人的跟班、助理，或者信徒、卫兵。

↑↑为人父母，需要像法国卢梭那样坦诚。让孩子毫无障碍地看到你力量的有限、品格的庸常，这样亲子才能真正亲密无间，孩子才可以毫无顾虑地向你袒露那些内心的小秘密。

↑↑简陷入精神困境时，她的父母可以说基本没帮上忙。这就是父母的功能性缺位，即，比较起来简的父母也挺好的，但是她们不具备某些重要功能。包括对孩子爱的给予，做得不如罗伯特好，才给了他可乘之机。

If you surrender to the air, you can ride it.

-Toni Morrison, Song of Solomon

如果臣服于空气，就能自由飞翔。

（限制人的框架，别人的看法，打击，失败，误解，只是因为他们没有学会臣服于当下的呼吸，不会驾驭空气而产生的挣扎，而我不必跟着一起挣扎。无论做任何决策，只要是决策，只要是实践，我都是一个人，而无法找别人当作依靠，也无法逃避自己身而为人的责任，每个人也只有在自身的独立当中才能真正交汇。）

碧昂斯是美国最为耀眼的巨星。有些人说碧昂斯之所以成功是家境好，虽然无法否认环境对人的影响，但是无论碧昂斯的家庭背景，创作团队，有多么耀眼，她都是团队中的核心人物，是一位坚强而灵动，兼具女性性感妩媚，男性澎湃力量的完整的人。

在舞台上，她独立又自信的表演，是彻底地信任自己的心的结果，在彻底地感受自己，相信自己中，也彻底地相信她的同伴。舞台上的一切，既是在探索和释放自己的声音，想法，感受，也是在回家，向内寻，在体验所有人内心的融合。碧昂斯的专心和负责，不仅体现在舞蹈和音乐上，她对舞台布景，关于演出的一切细节都精益求精。由此可见一个人可以发挥出的能量可以是远远超过自己想象的。这也对应了纪录片中的一句话，你只能成为自己能够想象成为的人。

碧昂斯让人更为印象深刻的是她的女权主义思想。她是我在上学时最喜欢的明星，那时并不了解女权主义，因为没有进入社会，也从来没有关心过女权的含义，对于女性普遍遭受的歧视，痛苦，被压抑的声音，完全没有概念。也曾经天真地以为，在学校，在自己的家庭中，从来没有遇到过歧视女性的情况。现在才意识到，情况或许不是之前的天真设想的一样。

如果一个人不被允许说话，发出自己真实的声音，可能慢慢地，这个人就会失声，成为哑巴，或者成为一个只能通过别人的声音说话的人，而这个处境，正是千千万万女性的处境。由于自己的懒惰，在遇到痛苦和挫折时，没有及时进行反思，看不清楚发生了什么，为什么会发生这些问题，导致了大部分时候都在逃避痛苦的过程中错失了机会的结果。不愿意承受痛苦，就无法领悟痛苦和挫折背后的深意，就会不断地在同样的错误里打滚。除非有一天意识到，必须抬起自己的头，好好看看眼前的痛苦带来的经验和含义是什么，否则命运就一定会让自己不断地在同样的地方跌倒，直到训练自己看到现状为止。

每个人来到这个世界上，是带着学习和实践的任务的。任务的样子，往往以挫折，痛苦，失败的面目出现，如果不肯承认和反思痛苦，就会错过启示。拒绝看到的，拒绝正视的，甚至不承认其中自己的问题，命运就会一次又一次让自己重复相同的境遇，直到开始学习，开始认识，开始改变。

比如对于女性普遍的处境，以及自己的处境的认知，并不是没有遇到机会，只是没有感受，已经在歧视的环境中而不自知。女性往往不被鼓励继续深造，也没有被教育如何认识和反思社会现实，而容易在被“呵护”的环境中，心安理得对眼前的现实“失明”。但是这个现实，理所当然而不被让知道的现实，很可能只是一套体系或者工具。比如无法意识到种种三从四德的言论教化，不被鼓励发出自己的声音，不被鼓励追求自己的梦想，不要争强好胜，不要自强不息，承认自己是弱者，相夫教子，结婚生子，安静沉默，已经是社会物化和歧视女性的途径和工具。

当真的按照父母，或者社会的惯性，走下去，就会“不知不觉”落入普遍的女性的艰难处境中，而这一点，只有真的落入这个圈套，尝到苦果以后，才会明白什么叫做歧视。什么叫做“应该听话”，“不要懒惰，但是也不要当个女强人，否则没有男人喜欢”，“早点生孩子”，“不要那么有主见”？

碧昂斯的演唱会，所要表达的，就是让人“看见”一直以来的社会规则带给女性的枷锁和钳制，为什么身为女性不能表达自己的想法，不能说真话，不能追求自己的梦想，不能有自己的声音，不能独自探索自己喜欢的世界？

这些愿望，原本是身为一个人，所应该具有的最基本的权利，也就是勇敢，诚实，善良，独立，但是为什么在社会的规训下，最“普通”的，生而为人的权利，都不再在女性的世界中出现？在这样的环境下，女性以为闭嘴了，安静了，才是正确的。几乎没有男人喜欢一个太想法，有主见的女性，这点在我认识的自以为开明的，有知识和文化的男性身上，也会不自知地表现出这样的偏见，因为这样的女性是对他们而言非常不“省事”，或许对他们而言，“省事”的就是好的，而不是好才是好。

女性成长的道路，如果把男性和社会的偏见，怀疑，包括女性不自知的对自己的，对同胞女性的偏见和歧视，都算作荆棘，那么女性这一路走来，如果想要成为一个真正的人，能够独立思考，生活，觉醒的个体，就必须踩过无数的荆棘。

当然如果不想成为一个觉醒的人，按着痛苦最小化的路径走，就会成为一个别人眼中的，过得去的好女人，因为当你不再发出自己的声音，不再倾听自己的声音，只要按照别人满意的方式过，至少别人（已经被规训的女性和男性）就不会再在你成为觉醒，独立的个体的路上设置障碍，你也就自然而然，成为不自信，痛苦，受挫的传统女性，而忘记了自己“是人”。

任何一个人，本来就不应该以标签和身份而活着，这么简单的道理，成为一个真实的人，在大多数人看来反而“不正常”。但是在碧昂斯的演唱会上，在她的歌词中，在大学的校训里，才会发现“不正常”原本“再正常不过”，成为一个完整的人，才是人的第一任务，而不是社会赋予的符号和身份。为什么这么简单的常识，在社会里就成了奇葩的现象？

大学之所以成为大学，偶像之所以有力量，并不是因为探路者和前辈的教育是普遍真理，而是因为，普遍真理其实并不“普遍”。如果社会是染缸，大学是源头的活水，那么大学就是在不断努力将“常识”，看似最为平凡又深奥的道理，通过教育，输送进人的灵魂，再灌输进或许连常识都不具备的社会。

教育不是为了让学生，在毕业后，当发现社会的规则和学校教的不同时，否定学校的教育，甚至认为那些是老掉牙的一套，于是逐渐“成熟”，去当染缸的一员，成为染缸积极分子。人不应该忘记教育最初的作用，以及将教育转化为实践的必要性。实践就是将源头清澈的活水灌入社会普遍的“染缸的规则”中，将染缸中的浑浊的水，转化为人原本该有的清澈的过程。完成这个过程的前提是遇到荆棘和困难时，不放弃努力，不放弃学习，不屈服于所谓的社会规则。

如果在进入社会的习俗后，遭受痛苦和挫折时，不能将这些痛苦，放入沉思和反观，就很容易将以前所受的教育还给学校，忘记了之所以接受教育的目的。女性接受教育的目的是为了重返社会后，闭上嘴巴，三从四德，相夫教子，压抑自己，失去理想，孝顺公婆的吗？到底是自己不独立，还是别人不独立，服从了众人不独立的习惯而逐渐失去自我觉醒的机会，美其名曰将“浑浊”当作“成熟”？

在看完碧昂斯的演唱会后，才发现原来自己被打脸，被社会教育了这么多年抑郁的原因。碧昂斯在不断地努力让人看到女性所经历的伤痛，和从伤痛中仍然能够自强不息的精神，这些本来应该是做人所应该具备的基本的品质，即善良，诚实，勇气。但是即使是常识，却只有稀少的人真正看到，并且坚持实践。希望开始痛定思痛的自己，能够在作为人所必须经受的苦难中，时刻不忘记这些平凡而深奥的真理。

Keep going, no matter what.

-Reginald Lewis, Virginia State University, 1965

16岁时看了阿拉伯的劳伦斯几乎要放弃拍电影

And when the film was over, I wanted to not be a director anymore because the bar was too high.

It was the first time, seeing a movie, I realized that there are themes that aren't narrative story themes. There are themes that are character themes, that are personal themes. That David Lean created a portraiture, surrounded the portrait with a mural of scope and epic action, but at the heart and core of "Lawrence of Arabia" is "Who am I"?

I started making movies when I was a young kid, but I remember the time I almost gave up my dream of being a movie director. I must have been 16.

越对什么事情感到自信或确定无疑，成果就越少

The more I'm feeling confident and secure about something, the less I'm gonna put out. The more I'm feeling, "Uh-oh, this could be a major problem in getting the story told," I'm gonna work overtime to meet the challenge and get the job done. All right, that's done. I don't know if it's worth it.

Spielberg:And so, I hate the feeling of being nervous, but I need to feel in this moment I'm really not sure what I'm doing. And when that verges on panic, I get great ideas. The more I feel backed into a corner, the more rewarding it becomes when I figure my way out of the corner.

Just before I went off to make "Jaws," I got to meet Henry Hathaway. He was kind of a tough-guy director, and he said, "There's gonna be moments where you're gonna get to the set and you're not gonna know what the hell you're doing. It happens to all of us. You've gotta guard that secret with your life. Let no one see when you're unsure of yourself. Hide that from everybody, or you'll lose the respect of everyone."

未见到的潜在危险更让人恐惧，细腻的心理层面

I knew that it's gonna take three or four weeks to rebuild the shark, and so we'd have to make up something else that didn't exactly show the shark but gave the sense the shark was near.

The barrels were a godsend, because I didn't need to show the shark as long as those barrels were around. What you don't see is generally scarier than what you do see, and the script was filled with "shark." Shark here, shark there, shark everywhere. The movie doesn't have very much shark in it.

John Williams:If the shark had been available visually, it might have changed the whole psychology of the experience.

青少年时期的自我认知，摄像机就是笔

I didn't have a lot of high esteem for myself, you know, growing up. I just was a lonely guy.

The camera was my pen. I wrote my stories through the lens. And when I was able to say "action" and "cut," I wrested control of my life.

But I didn't know anything about whether I was gonna have a career or where this was gonna go. I just knew that it filled up the time and it gave me a tremendous amount of satisfaction. And the second I finished a movie, I wanted to start a new one because I felt good about myself when I was making a film. But when I had too much time to think, all those scary whispers would start-- start up. It was not fun to be me in between ideas or projects.

遇到伯乐

"If you sign with us, I will support you as strongly in failure as I will in success."

对镜头语言的掌控

Steven Bochco:Steven had a gear in his brain that automatically translated words into pictures almost without it being a conscious process for him. There was a unique visual voice there that you had to not only pay attention to, but you had to give somewhat of a free rein to.

Edelstein:Right off the bat, it was clear that no one moved the camera like Steven Spielberg. Other directors had a fantastic sense of space. Orson Welles, you name it, people who understood composition. But the way that Spielberg's camera moved through a shot and then ended up somewhere that completely shifted or intensified the emotion of the scene, that was just a natural gift he had. Who knows where that came from. Who-- but it was his own technique.没人象斯皮尔伯格一样移动摄像机。其他导演有很出色的空间感。随便说一个Orson Welles非常理解构图。但是斯皮尔伯格在一个镜头中对摄像机的移动，以及在某一处停下来，完全改变或强化了场景的情感，那是他的天分。

George Eckstein called me and said, "Network's really upset that the truck didn't blow up, so they're ordering us to go back to that cliff and blow the truck up." And I said, "I'm not gonna do it." The death of the truck is so agonizing. I said, "I made that truck die slowly." The oil, like blood, dripping off the steering wheel. The wheel slowly rolling to a stop. The fan still going, but the truck's dying. I mean, it's the death of the truck. That's what the audience wants to see. This criminal element paying-- you know, paying the price for what it did to this man. I wouldn't do it. I wouldn't blow up the truck.

对表达媒介的熟悉

Bochco:For Steven, the little screen was an interesting canvas, and obviously he painted on it very well, but he knew that this screen simply wasn't a large enough canvas.

Spielberg:For me, directing is camerawork, and so I'm very on the front line of that. I've gotta set up the shot, I've gotta block the actors, choreograph the movement of the scene, bring the camera into the choreography, figure out when the camera stops, how it moves, how far it moves, what the composition is, so I've always got my eye on the lens, and that's what I do. I even pick the lens I want.对我来说，导演就是摄像技术，因此我总是在摄像的前线。我需要设定镜头，隔离演员的因素，为镜头设计动作，将镜头带入到动作中，确定摄像机什么时候停止，怎样移动，移动多远，构图是什么样的，因此我的眼睛总是关注在镜头上，那就是我所做的。我甚至会自己挑选想要的镜头。

Scorsese:His strength is really the ability to be able to tell a story in pictures instinctively. I sometimes watch his pictures on TV without the sound just to see the pictures.

Edelstein:Pauline Kael, one of the most influential film critics of all time, wrote in "The New Yorker" that Steven Spielberg had made one of the most phenomenal debuts in the history of film. She compared him to Howard Hawks in terms of how natural his feel for the medium was. What Kael saw in Spielberg was someone with a real movie sense, but she also said she wasn't necessarily sure there was great depth to go with it. She didn't see a sign of an emerging film artist like Martin Scorsese. What she saw instead was the birth of a new generation Hollywood hand.

幸运的处于一个活跃的文化氛围中

Spielberg:We were very, very fortunate to be part of that time. The culture was converging. It was filmmakers, it was artists, musicians, performers. It was an incredible, fertile time.

未曾有意追求电影的精神内核，自己的精神层面会通过工作渗透到作品中

I don't search for films consciously that have a spiritual core. There's a spiritual part of myself that happens to bleed over into the work, and so I subconsciously, which is the only choice that's important, will find things that inherently have something of a belief system that's beyond our understanding, that's a little bit out there.

人与人之间的联结

Coyote:For many years I wondered about the universal appeal of this movie, and one day, it hit me. There are no two humans on Earth that are father apart than those humans and that alien creature. And if Elliott, and the mother, and the little girl, and the scientist, could all love and empathize and make a rapprochement and a rapport with this creature, so, too, can any two humans on Earth, and I think that was a subtext that bubbled up through the film and must have touched something, because you don't get many films that are universally loved and appreciated 40 years later. And it spoke to something. Some desire to be able to reach across boundaries and touch other people.

对儿童演员的特别关照

Spielberg:I think all of my movies that have dealt with young people and their stories are about the importance of empowering these children to take control of the story, at least take control of their lives.我所有的电影都与年轻人和他们的故事有关，使这些孩子们更强大，控制故事的呈现很重要，至少他们可以控制自己的生活。

二战喜剧片带来的失败与挫折

But it was like I committed a war crime by making "1941." Everyone was eviscerating it. I was really devastated. Just that feeling of failure, that cold emptiness, where every reminder of the movie, you get that sick feeling in the center of your stomach, and you just want to go dig a hole and stick your head in it. I mean, for the next year, I put my head in a lot of holes. And my friend George Lucas came to the rescue.

自身的成熟，期待电影在更本质更人性方面的变化

Spielberg:I was looking for a different perception of myself. And if I didn't want to consciously make a departure and prove something, not just to myself but to everyone else, I might not have chosen "Color Purple" as my next movie. But it was my first really mature film, which took on, you know, substantive, humanistic subject matter. I was turning 40 and I was looking at life perhaps less optimistically.

紫色中本可以有更深入的表达

Spielberg:I got in trouble with several critics who didn't like that I shied away from the love story between Shug and Celie. And the scene where Shug Avery shows Celie, with a mirror, her vagina, that that did not go into the movie, which would've really changed the entire nature and tone of the film. I just didn't go for the full monty the way the book did. I might've done that had I made the movie 10 years later. I was just timid. I was just a little embarrassed. I just wasn't the right guy to do that.

对自己犹太人身份从拒绝到接受

I certainly experienced being excluded and being picked on and discriminated against. All I wanted to do was fit in. And by being Jewish, there was no way I could fit into anything.

I began to deny my Jewishness, you know, began to deny everything that I had accepted as a child and was not willing to accept if it was going to make me a pariah. I was ashamed of myself. I still feel ashamed of myself even remembering that long stretch of my life where I didn't want to be Jewish anymore.

辛德勒名单的基调

I tried to do it with no fancy tricks, no fancy lenses, no big Hollywood sweeping cranes. I tried to take all the tools with which I made so many of my films and just chuck them out the window. I never handheld anything, but I wanted to handhold as much of "Schindler's List" as I possibly could. I just wanted to create for all of us the feeling that we were absolutely there at the time.

光影的隐喻

Neeson:Oskar Schindler was a gregarious man. He was a second-rate businessman. Bit of a shady character, you know? A man about town, loved the women, loved his booze. A bon vivant, that's what he was.

Spielberg:Everything we do in this medium is about light and shadow, how the cinematographer lights the actors, lights the set. If you look at "Schindler's List," Amon Goeth was always lit beautifully. He always had that beautiful front light. You know, the guy was very clear. There was no mystery in him. You don't have to enhance his evilness, if you may say, by lighting. Now, if you look at Oskar Schindler, that was a confused individual. He came to Poland to make money, so it's always glamorous, but always shadowy. And then as the movie's progressing, he gets more frontal light. The shadows disappear.身为导演的情感投入，以及电影之外的社会互动

It was, emotionally, the hardest movie I've ever made.

Kennedy:That was a pivotal moment in Steven's life. He recognized he couldn't take any of the profits from the film. He wanted to give something back, so he started what became the Shoah Foundation, documenting that oral history and capturing history in a way that allowed people not to forget.

多面手

Robert Zemeckis:For a filmmaker, you can't have a better producer than one of the greatest directors in the world. He really nurtures young talent coming up. It's a pretty amazing roster. He's also a major figure in the television business. He started a restaurant. Dive! Submarine sandwiches. The man was, like, doing 27 things at once and being perfectly unselfconscious about it.

Geffen:I don't think Steven really fears anything. He's always ready to go and do something new.

拯救大兵瑞恩中镜头距离与观众心理感觉的关系，声效，应变能力

Spielberg:I tried very, very hard to put the audience as close to the experience as I possibly knew how to do so there wouldn't ever be a safe feeling in the audience. And when you narrow that distance-- if you're successful in narrowing the distance, then the audience really becomes those characters.

Edelstein:In "Saving Private Ryan," Spielberg understood the expressionistic possibilities of sound.

And if you're not Steven, if you don't have this lifetime of cinematic language in your head, that's a different kind of day. But because his eye is so connected to his brain and every movie that he's ever seen and every movie that he's ever made, he just went out and said, "Here's how we're gonna do this, and that's it." Incredible.

自身的情感挫折与电影作为治疗方法

It was complex for me for a long time, but at least I had a art form that I could filter it through. At least I had that. If movies did anything for me, it-- I've avoided therapy because movies are my therapy.

“无论怎样都要争取自由”的电影主题，爱国主义与理想主义

Insdorf:There are people struggling in one way or another for freedom in these movies. Give... us free. He doesn't take freedom for granted.

Spielberg:I really believe in this country, and I always have. And it just resonated throughout my work-- wanting to tell American stories, wanting to tell stories about principled, ethical people who, against all advice and against most everyone else's better judgment, just proceed to do the right thing. I'm sure that sounds like I'm this kind of, you know, idealist or some sort of a patriot, but I am a patriot. And I'm somewhat of an idealist, too.

讲故事的方法

Steven worked a long time to find where the story was to tell it.斯蒂芬会花很长时间去找在哪里讲故事。

保持中立

Spielberg:I felt I could not make this one-sided. And so, I knew it would be controversial from the very get-go.

Daniel Craig:This movie was trying to affect and turn on a debate. Is vengeance the answer? Does it actually solve anything? If you continue the cycle of violence and cycle of blood, then... that's what they'll be and nothing else. Steven was very keen to tell a human story, that these were men and not superheroes. Their indecision and their mistakes and their-- is the reality of what happened, you know? Life isn't a "James Bond" movie.复仇是否就是答案

叙事的方法

Kushner:You're in the hands of somebody who will always show you what you need to see in order to understand, on a narrative level, what's happening. And you'll also see a lot of things that will help you understand on deeper levels as well. And that sort of narrative device

电影带出的不确定性

Hoberman:The movie was perceived to be suffering from a sense of moral equivalence, which is really the bravest thing about the movie. It's looking for aspects of humanity on both sides of this conflict. Ambiguity is something that you don't normally associate with Spielberg's films, and "Munich" is the film where he went the furthest in the bluntness and the ferocity with which he approached that subject.

家庭，分离与重聚

Spielberg:Family is a big element in my life, which is why so many of my stories are about separation and then reunification. Even "Lincoln" is about separation and reunification.

工作团队的稳定，与他人合作，激励同伴

Williams:He understands that people and can serve him and how to synchronize his wishes with your own. He would've made a great general.

在看电影中不断学习

Kennedy:Steven looks at movies constantly and over and over and over again, referencing shots and framing and ideas. That's something Steven does all the time.Spielberg:Great filmmakers' works live on to create tremendous moments of inspiration. And so, one of the films I still see every year is "Lawrence of Arabia." The shots, the sheer vistas, and the portrait of such a complex character, it's pure moviemaking. 伟大的电影导演的工作是创造巨大的启发性时刻。自我审视中的过去，成长

Spielberg:Many years ago, Pauline Kael gave me a really great review on "Sugarland Express," but she said, "Whatever's on the surface might be all that is there. There may be nothing behind that." And she was absolutely right. I hadn't grown up yet through the movies. That was going to come in time.

到现在为止的评论

Maslin:Take a look at what he's done over close to 50 years. There's certainly a lot of variety. There are some things he's done that haven't worked, but there is absolutely nobody like him and no film career trajectory that is anything like his in the history of film. He speaks cinema as if it's his native language. He is so fluent in it that he does things that nobody else would dare to do and they are instantly recognizable as things that are purely his.

Scorsese:He has a dynamic sense of real filmmaking. I'm talking about filmmaking of--in the great narrative tradition of American cinema. 真正的电影制作的动态感

Coppola:Steven was blessed in that he could be commercial and he could do art.That's why I always compare him to a kind of George Gershwin, because Gershwin could write a Broadway show or he could write "Concerto in F." He could both, and very few people can do both. And Steven can do both. And that's a talent you have to be born with. 商业与艺术

我总会下意识反想中国的电影，都是什么狗屁。院线上，最近几年，称得上眼前一亮的只有徐浩峰的民国武林，别的我真的记不起来。商业片里，宁浩的疯狂的外星人也是可以的。剩下的全是小鲜肉狗屎或者张艺谋陈凯歌那样的老狗屎。

也别说什么政审严苛、限制创作。我看更是商业利益的副作用。小鲜肉，连他妈话都说不利索就要捧成明星，一过三十就能当导演。都说大陆的中年演员没有活路，是啊，为什么？这些完全不取决于观众，观众大部分都是傻子，给什么吃什么，我一个同学就这样总结自己的观影经历：放假了，陪老婆去电影院，有什么算什么。关键还是创作方面的决策，明星等于票房，谁等于明星？现在是幼齿等于明星。除了这一条什么都不管了。大家拿着这条思路蜂拥而上，斥资生产垃圾。

就是《好想吃拉面》这样一部电影，复杂吗？耗资吗？但是剧本很完整，起承转合，戏剧冲突，主题真挚，应有尽有。从表面说，以美食为主题，用美少女充盈银幕，老者、中年人各色各样，还有什么可挑剔的？这样就足够了。认真工作，为了追求某个事物的内部价值而劳动，这样的主题谈不上惊异，但足够坚硬。反观我国大陆现在的电影风气，只能伤害人的感知和判断。香港就不提了，它的电影等娱乐已在我的视线之外。台湾也快凉凉了。大陆生机勃勃，却把精力和钱用在了奇怪的地方，就像张艺谋的想象力。

日本人的工匠、精品意识是很能影响人的。前些天有个同学在微信朋友圈发了个视频，说日本人在机场装卸行李时都是那么的轻柔且一丝不苟。我说我也可以这样工作，只是现在中国没有人“愿意”我这样工作。现在的中国，这样的工作态度就等于自寻死路。真不知道这个波峰哪年能过去。

电影，它只是电影。电影不是什么高深、玄妙的艺术。但它也不是一件衣裳那样单薄的事物，样子好看就行，有女人愿意花钱买就行。中国电影的道德已经失范，张艺谋几乎成了流氓头子，自己拍些狗屎还大言不惭别人也这水平（《十三邀》），还有那么多人爱他、举他、恭敬他。大众的生活是大众自己选择的，说到底谁也怨不得。中国大众仍然亟待提高整体的教育水平和文化修养，没有三五十年估计不会有显著的改观。

配乐导演出来受死！！！请问拍的是鬼片吗？？？音乐一出来就出戏！！！！！演员被辣鸡编剧毁了，罗笔芯这个角色完全脸谱化，搞的演员的表演好像一直都只有一个表情，一个语气，聂远是个好演员，奈何剧情太垃圾搞得我觉得他的表演都有点问题了，这个角色设定的太神通了，法医破案，其他警察全成了NPC，关键这个法医能破案好像也不真的是因为尸体验得好，验尸作为一个关键点总是时有时无。为什么要给画面配文字说明？？？无处不在的文字说明！！！请问是对自己拍的东西多没有信心才会事无巨细地配文字解释说明？？？那请问我们观众看什么呢？？？侦探悬疑剧居然把所有细节仔仔细细地打在画面上，嗯？？？

剧情就不提了，bug多到让人怀疑智商，验尸验尸没讲清楚，破案破案没讲清楚，重点不知道在哪儿，整个一个流水账，没得爆点，一个悬疑侦探剧全程没有紧张感，除了神出鬼没的配乐突然出现吓死人……人物行动的逻辑完全经不起推敲，剧情前后衔接生硬。

最可怕的，是每个故事最后出来的小剧场，剧情尬，演技尬，咋想的？？？

嚯，看了一部比我爸妈还老的电影，那应该算是奶奶辈儿年代的电影了，可惜，我没法去问一问奶奶，你看过这部电影吗，你认识当年这些电影明星吗，他们如今应该和你一般大小。

最近剧慌，也总觉得什么都看不下去，明明以前不看综艺甚至不看好综艺，现在是坐着等更新，《乘风破浪的姐姐》以及越来越不怎么好看的《向往的生活》、《奔跑吧兄弟》，好像不更新没东西看似的。曾经能一天刷几部好电影，现在总静不下来心来。

有一种底气，叫实力派的演技！u1s1张博身上那股子永远不变的正气，还有那种不服输的劲儿，目前为止，张博的剧，他的表演还没有让我令人失望过。这次的《逐梦蓝天》感觉是博哥又一次突破，我太喜欢他演这种题材的作品了，从一开始的飞行员，军人形象的张博永远演在我的帅点上！开飞机的样子，追击敌机，甚至完成超高难度飞行击落敌机，实在是还原我军精神，看的人热血沸腾，加上博哥对秦天的人物塑造，既演出了这个角色所处年代年龄上的热血冲劲儿，又演出了飞行员的沉稳和责任感。还有当他驾驶飞机参与在剧中开国大典的飞过天安门敬礼的那一刻，画面感先不说，爱国情怀燃的我热泪盈眶，太骄傲~虽然后来因为受伤不能飞的样子，眼神黯淡身体佝偻着实在让人心疼，但当他说出决定造飞机的那一刻眼里的光又亮回来的样子，又被狠狠的戳到，再就是他面对挫折时的不妥协不放弃，都情不自禁的被带动跟他一样，哈哈哈，新买的书更香了，想跟剧中他演的秦天一样，每天打开学习强国，有！跨年龄的角色是很有挑战性的，《逐梦蓝天》这部剧70余年的时间跨度对演员真的是一种考验，但博哥对人物的把握很到位，现在看到30多集了，真的有觉得他是一个充满智慧又有点活泼且倔强的小老头，他对秦天在很多细节处理都十分很有趣~不过这也不是博哥第一次演这样跨度的人物了，之前在《大秦帝国》里，秦襄王嬴稷也是这样一个跨度很大的角色，从青年到暮年，但是这两个角色的反差感真的是巨大，一个是大国工程师的一生，一个是语文课本里最强反派的帝王，很难想象这都是同一个人演出来的，忍不住为博哥点个赞！同时，真的还挺期待“秦天”小老头后半生的戏份的，大概这个倔强的脾气，不会比年轻的时候“安分”！

【详细】

13827900